The Physics Travel Guide

Ergodicity

Prerequisites: Statistical Mechanics, Phase Space. Full path (10 pages)

Intuitive

A billiard ball in a rectangle with two circular ends: slight changes in initial conditions make such a big difference that eventually it could be anywhere. To be precise, we say its motion is "ergodic".

ergodicity.mp4

For the precise definition of "ergodic" read my diary:

(link: https://tinyurl.com/baez-bunimovich) tinyurl.com/baez-bunimovich

great example of the evolution of apparent randomness from a completely deterministic process

Yes, it sort of demystifies how that works.

https://mobile.twitter.com/johncarlosbaez/status/1023252524248137728

see also https://plus.google.com/+johncbaez999/posts/cWQ3RYLCAoi

Concrete

Statistical mechanics replaces the long-time behaviour of a system by an average over an ensemble. Ergodicity is the property that justifies this replacement.

Consider a Hamiltonian system with phase space coordinates x=(q,p)x = (q, p) and flow ϕt\phi_t. Energy is conserved, so a trajectory stays on the energy surface ΣE={x:H(x)=E}\Sigma_E = \{x : H(x) = E\}. Liouville's theorem implies that the microcanonical measure dμE=δ(H(x)−E) dnq dnpΩ(E),Ω(E)=∫δ(H(x)−E) dnq dnp,d\mu_E = \frac{\delta(H(x) - E)\, d^{n}q\, d^{n}p}{\Omega(E)}, \qquad \Omega(E) = \int \delta(H(x) - E)\, d^{n}q\, d^{n}p, is invariant under the flow. For an observable ff define the time average along the trajectory starting at xx, fˉ(x)=lim⁡T→∞1T∫0Tf(ϕtx) dt,\bar f(x) = \lim_{T\to\infty} \frac{1}{T}\int_0^T f(\phi_t x)\, dt , and the ensemble average ⟨f⟩=∫f dμE\langle f \rangle = \int f\, d\mu_E. The system is ergodic on ΣE\Sigma_E if fˉ(x)=⟨f⟩\bar f(x) = \langle f\rangle for every integrable ff and for almost every starting point xx (all except a set of measure zero). An equivalent condition: every measurable subset of ΣE\Sigma_E that is invariant under the flow has measure 00 or 11. A trajectory then cannot be confined to a region of nonzero but incomplete measure.

Example: rotation on a circle. Take x∈[0,1)x \in [0,1) and the discrete map xn+1=xn+α mod 1x_{n+1} = x_n + \alpha \bmod 1, which preserves the length measure dxdx. Expand an observable in Fourier modes, f(x)=∑kcke2πikxf(x) = \sum_k c_k e^{2\pi i k x}. For k≠0k \neq 0 the time average of one mode is a geometric sum, 1N∑n=0N−1e2πik(x+nα)=e2πikxN 1−e2πikNα1−e2πikα→N→∞0,\frac{1}{N}\sum_{n=0}^{N-1} e^{2\pi i k (x + n\alpha)} = \frac{e^{2\pi i k x}}{N}\,\frac{1 - e^{2\pi i k N\alpha}}{1 - e^{2\pi i k\alpha}} \xrightarrow{N\to\infty} 0 , provided kαk\alpha is not an integer. So if α\alpha is irrational, every mode except k=0k = 0 averages to zero and fˉ=c0=∫01f dx\bar f = c_0 = \int_0^1 f\, dx: the map is ergodic. If α=p/q\alpha = p/q is rational, every orbit is periodic with qq points and the map is not ergodic.

Physical systems. The same argument shows that two uncoupled harmonic oscillators with frequencies ω1,ω2\omega_1, \omega_2 are not ergodic on their energy surface, since each energy is conserved separately. Each trajectory fills a torus, densely if ω1/ω2\omega_1/\omega_2 is irrational, but the torus has measure zero on ΣE\Sigma_E. In general a system with additional conserved quantities, such as an integrable system, is not ergodic on the energy surface. Chaotic billiards such as the Bunimovich stadium mentioned above are proven to be ergodic. For systems close to integrable, KAM theory shows that a set of invariant tori of positive measure survives, so these systems are not ergodic either.

Abstract

Setting. A measure-preserving dynamical system is a probability space (X,F,μ)(X, \mathcal F, \mu) with a measurable map T:X→XT: X \to X (or a flow ϕt\phi_t) such that μ(T−1A)=μ(A)\mu(T^{-1}A) = \mu(A) for all A∈FA \in \mathcal F. It is ergodic if every invariant set, T−1A=AT^{-1}A = A, has μ(A)∈{0,1}\mu(A) \in \{0, 1\}.

Ergodic theorems. Birkhoff's pointwise ergodic theorem states that for every f∈L1(μ)f \in L^1(\mu) the averages 1N∑n=0N−1f(Tnx)\frac{1}{N}\sum_{n=0}^{N-1} f(T^n x) converge for μ\mu-almost every xx to the conditional expectation E[f∣I](x)\mathbb E[f \mid \mathcal I](x), where I\mathcal I is the σ\sigma-algebra of invariant sets. For an ergodic system I\mathcal I is trivial and the limit is ∫Xf dμ\int_X f\, d\mu. Von Neumann's mean ergodic theorem is the Hilbert space version: the Koopman operator Uf=f∘TU f = f \circ T is an isometry of L2(μ)L^2(\mu) (unitary if TT is invertible), and the averages 1N∑n<NUnf\frac1N\sum_{n<N} U^n f converge in L2L^2 to the orthogonal projection of ff onto the subspace of UU-invariant functions. Ergodicity is equivalent to this subspace being the constants, that is, the eigenvalue 11 of UU being simple.

Invariant measures. The set of TT-invariant probability measures is convex. A measure is ergodic if and only if it is an extreme point of this set, and every invariant measure decomposes into ergodic ones (ergodic decomposition, under mild regularity assumptions on XX). In statistical mechanics this mirrors the decomposition of a Gibbs state into pure phases.

Stronger properties. Ergodicity is the weakest in a hierarchy of randomness properties: Bernoulli⇒K-system⇒mixing⇒weak mixing⇒ergodic.\text{Bernoulli} \Rightarrow \text{K-system} \Rightarrow \text{mixing} \Rightarrow \text{weak mixing} \Rightarrow \text{ergodic}. Mixing means μ(T−nA∩B)→μ(A)μ(B)\mu(T^{-n}A \cap B) \to \mu(A)\mu(B) for all measurable A,BA, B, so correlations decay and an initial non-equilibrium distribution relaxes towards μ\mu in the weak sense. Ergodicity alone only controls time averages. The circle rotation by an irrational angle is ergodic but not weakly mixing, because UU has the eigenfunctions e2πikxe^{2\pi i k x} with eigenvalues e2πikαe^{2\pi i k\alpha}. Weak mixing is equivalent to UU having no eigenfunctions other than the constants.

Path to this page

  1. Calculus
  2. Linear Algebra
  3. Newton's Second Law
  4. Statistics
  5. Vector Calculus
  6. Entropy
  7. Newtonian Mechanics
  8. Configuration Space
  9. Statistical Mechanics
  10. Phase Space