The Physics Travel Guide

Topological Defects

Prerequisites: Symmetry Breaking, Topology. Full path (14 pages)

Why is it interesting?

Topological defects are of common interest to condensed matter physics, atomic physics, astrophysics and cosmology, as well as algebraic topology. When the symmetry group GG spontaneously breaks down to its subgroup HH, there are continuously connected ground states parametrized by the coset space G/HG/H. The homotopy groups of the coset space then tell us what kinds of topological effects are possible. In most cases, non-trivial πd(G/H)\pi_d(G/H) implies the existence of (2−d)(2-d)-dimensional topological defect. If the coset space has disconnected pieces (π0(G/H)≠0\pi_0 (G/H) \neq 0), we expect domain walls. For multiply-connected space (π1(G/H)≠0\pi_1 (G/H)\neq 0), there are strings/ vortices. If the boundary of space can map non-trivially to the coset space (π2(G/H)≠0\pi_2(G/H)\neq 0), we expect point-like defects such as monopoles. An exception to the rule is when the whole space is mapped non-trivially to the coset space (π3(G/H)≠0\pi_3(G/H) \neq 0), where skyrmions are stabilized by non-renormalizable terms in the low-energy effective theory. In this case, it is not the boundary condition that is topologically non-trivial, but the configuration in the bulk.

Topological Dark Matter by Hitoshi Murayama, Jing Shu


Important Topological Defects:

Intuitive

When a lake freezes, ice starts to form at many places at once. Each patch of ice grows with its own crystal orientation, and where two patches with different orientations meet, they cannot fit together perfectly. A seam of misaligned molecules remains between them. Such seams are defects, and they persist because removing one would mean rearranging a whole patch of ice.

The same thing happens whenever a system settles into one of several equivalent ordered states. Think of a field of compass needles that all want to point in the same direction but have no preference for which direction. In one region they agree on north, in a distant region on east. In between, the direction has to turn smoothly. Sometimes this works out with no trouble. In other cases the arrangement contains a twist that cannot be smoothed out anywhere: walk in a circle around a certain point and the needles turn once around the full compass. Near that point the needles cannot decide on any direction, so the order breaks down there, and this costs energy.

A topological defect is such a place where the order must break down because of the way the surrounding field is arranged. The word "topological" says that the reason is a counting property, like the number of times the needles wind around, which cannot change under small smooth deformations. So the defect cannot simply decay. It can only disappear by meeting a defect of the opposite kind, or by moving out of the system.

Depending on the kind of order, defects are walls (between two regions in different states), lines (like the swirl in a whirlpool, or a vortex in a superfluid), or points (like a hedgehog of needles all pointing outward). They are seen in liquid crystals, magnets, superfluids and superconductors. In cosmology one expects them to have formed when the early universe cooled through symmetry breaking phase transitions, for the same reason as the seams in the ice.

Concrete

The three standard examples below follow the same pattern. A field theory has a potential with a set of degenerate minima, the vacuum manifold. Far from the defect the field sits in this manifold, and the way it does so on a large sphere or circle around the defect cannot be undone continuously. Somewhere inside, the field must leave the vacuum manifold, and the potential energy stored there is the defect's energy. We use a static real or complex scalar field with energy density 12(∇ϕ)2+V(ϕ)\frac{1}{2}(\nabla\phi)^2 + V(\phi) (or ∣∇ϕ∣2+V|\nabla\phi|^2 + V for complex ϕ\phi).

Domain wall (kink). Take a real scalar with V(ϕ)=λ4(ϕ2−η2)2,V(\phi) = \frac{\lambda}{4}\left(\phi^2 - \eta^2\right)^2 , with two minima ϕ=±η\phi = \pm\eta, related by the Z2\mathbb{Z}_2 symmetry ϕ→−ϕ\phi\to-\phi. A configuration with ϕ→−η\phi \to -\eta for x→−∞x \to -\infty and ϕ→+η\phi\to+\eta for x→+∞x\to+\infty must pass through ϕ=0\phi = 0. The static field equation ϕ′′=V′(ϕ)=λϕ(ϕ2−η2)\phi'' = V'(\phi) = \lambda\phi(\phi^2 - \eta^2) is solved by ϕ(x)=ηtanh⁡(λ2 η x),\phi(x) = \eta\tanh\left(\sqrt{\frac{\lambda}{2}}\,\eta\, x\right), as one checks by differentiating twice. The wall has thickness δ∼(λ η)−1\delta \sim (\sqrt\lambda\,\eta)^{-1} and energy per unit area σ=∫−∞∞dx[12ϕ′2+V(ϕ)]=223λ η3.\sigma = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dx\left[\frac{1}{2}\phi'^2 + V(\phi)\right] = \frac{2\sqrt 2}{3}\sqrt\lambda\,\eta^3 . For this solution the two terms in the integrand are equal pointwise, which makes the integral easy. In three dimensions the kink extended in yy and zz is a two-dimensional wall.

Vortex (string). Take a complex scalar with V=λ4(∣ϕ∣2−η2)2V = \frac{\lambda}{4}(|\phi|^2 - \eta^2)^2, whose minima form a circle ϕ=ηeiα\phi = \eta e^{i\alpha}. In the plane, the ansatz ϕ(r,θ)=f(r) einθ,f(0)=0,  f(∞)=η,\phi(r,\theta) = f(r)\, e^{in\theta}, \qquad f(0) = 0,\; f(\infty) = \eta , has winding number n=12π∮C∇α⋅dl⃗∈Zn = \frac{1}{2\pi}\oint_C \nabla\alpha\cdot d\vec l \in \mathbb{Z} around any large circle CC, where α\alpha is the phase of ϕ\phi. Single-valuedness of ϕ\phi forces nn to be an integer, and an integer cannot change under continuous deformations, so a configuration with n≠0n \neq 0 cannot be deformed into the uniform vacuum. Far from the core ∣∇ϕ∣2≈η2n2/r2|\nabla\phi|^2 \approx \eta^2 n^2/r^2, so the energy per unit length within radius RR grows as 2πn2η2ln⁡(R/δ)2\pi n^2\eta^2\ln(R/\delta): a global vortex has a logarithmically divergent energy. If the U(1)U(1) is gauged, the gauge field cancels the gradient at large rr and the vortex has finite energy per length and carries a quantised magnetic flux (see vortices). In three dimensions the vortex extends along a line, a string.

Monopole (hedgehog). Take a real triplet ϕ⃗\vec\phi with V=λ4(ϕ⃗ 2−η2)2V = \frac{\lambda}{4}(\vec\phi^{\,2} - \eta^2)^2, whose minima form a sphere S2S^2. The hedgehog ϕ⃗(x⃗)=η h(r) x⃗r,h(0)=0,  h(∞)=1,\vec\phi(\vec x) = \eta\, h(r)\,\frac{\vec x}{r}, \qquad h(0) = 0,\; h(\infty) = 1 , maps a large sphere around the origin once onto the vacuum sphere and cannot be unwound. Coupling to an SO(3)SO(3) gauge field gives the 't Hooft-Polyakov magnetic monopole.

Formation. In a phase transition the field picks its vacuum value independently in regions farther apart than a correlation length, since there is no reason for distant regions to agree. Where several regions meet, the vacuum values can wind, and defects are left behind. This is the Kibble mechanism, and it predicts a defect density set by the correlation length at the transition.


Recommended Resources:

Abstract

Topological defects are most easily understood by considering the scalar potential. A non-trivial vev breaks a given group GG to some subgroup HH. Depending on the homotopy groups of the vacuum manifold G/HG/H (speak G mod H), we get different topological defects.


Recommended Resources:

Examples

Domain Wall

Consider the possibility that φ = +η at x = +∞ and φ = −η at x = −∞. In this case, the continuous function φ(x) has to go from −η to +η as x is taken from −∞ to +∞ and so must necessarily pass through φ = 0. But then there is energy in this field configuration since the potential is non-zero when φ = 0. Also, this configuration cannot relax to either of the two vacuum configurations, say φ(x) = +η, since that involves changing the field over an infinite volume from −η to +η, which would cost an infinite amount of energy

https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-ph/9710292.pdf

FAQ

What topological defects are present in a given model?

The problem of finding the types of topological defects present in a given model reduces to finding the homotopy groups for a certain symmetry breaking G → H. That is, we need to find πn(G/H) (n = 0, 1, 2, 3) given the groups G and H. In general, this can be quite complicated but there is an immensely useful theorem which is often applicable and simplifies matters.

https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-ph/9710292.pdf

Why are Topological Defects Stable?

Suppose we consider a point defect and enclose it by an imaginary sphere S2. If we avoid other defects, all spheres about the point will be equivalent for our purposes, because they can be continuously deformed into one another inside V. Restricted to the sphere, cp defines a map S2+ A. If there is some topologically non-trivial aspect of this map, such as a winding number, the point defect will be topologically stable. It will not be able to just disappear leaving the medium in a uniform state with cp constant because, once it had gone, we could continuously deform the sphere to a point. The winding number, or whatever, would have had to have abruptly vanished, contradicting the assumed continuity. Similarly for a line defect, we take a circle S' about the line and obtain a map S' + A whose topological characteristics could ensure the stability of the defect.

Topological structures in field theories by Goddard and Mansfield

What classes of topological defects exist?

The field theories discussed above fall into two classes from the point of view of their topology. Suppose we are working in d space dimensions. In the first place we have theories, like the Abelian Higgs model of §2.1, where we have a potential function V(φ)V(\varphi) and φ\varphi must tend to a zero (i.e. minimum) of V as we approach spatial infinity. In this case, at any given time, φ\varphi defines a map φ∞(n^)=lim⁡r→∞φ(rn^)\varphi_\infty (\hat n) = \lim_{r\to\infty} \varphi(r \hat n) which takes its values in the set of values which minimises V, M={φ:V(φ)=0M=\{ \varphi: V(\varphi)=0 The directions n^\hat n in which one can approach infinity constitute a (d - 1)-dimensional sphere, the unit sphere in RdR^d. Thus φ∞\varphi_\infty defines a map Sd−1→MS^{d-1} \to M.

The second class of possibilities is not the result of non-trivial boundary conditions. Here we have a field which is always constrained to take its values in some manifold MM, which is not simply a linear space. This time the boundary conditions are actually supposed to be trivial in the sense that φ\varphi tends to a limit φ∞∈M\varphi_\infty \in M of course, independently of the direction in which we approach spatial infinity. In this case we can compactify space, RdR^d, by adding a point at infinity, to obtain what is topologically a sphere SdS^d (cf stereographic projection), with φ\varphi being assigned the value φN\varphi_N at the point of SdS^d corresponding to infinity. In this way we obtain a map φ\varphi : Sd→MS^d \to M.

Topological structures in field theories by Goddard and Mansfield

What's the experimental status of topological defects?

No topological defects of any type have yet been observed by astronomers, however, and certain types are not compatible with current observations; in particular, if domain walls and monopoles were present in the observable universe, they would result in significant deviations from what astronomers can see. Theories that predict the formation of these structures within the observable universe can therefore be largely ruled out.

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1206.1294.pdf

Path to this page

  1. Calculus
  2. Linear Algebra
  3. Functional
  4. Group Theory
  5. Newton's Second Law
  6. Product Spaces
  7. Vector Calculus
  8. Newtonian Mechanics
  9. Symmetry
  10. Topology
  11. Variational Calculus
  12. Euler-Lagrange Equations
  13. Lagrangian Formalism
  14. Symmetry Breaking

Leads to: Magnetic Monopoles, Vortices.