Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
advanced_tools:borel_summation [2017/06/12 14:17] jakobadmin [Student] |
advanced_tools:borel_summation [2017/06/12 16:53] jakobadmin |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
For a nice discussion, see section 11.4 in Rajaramans "Solitons and Instantons" and page 6 in https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-th/0207046.pdf | For a nice discussion, see section 11.4 in Rajaramans "Solitons and Instantons" and page 6 in https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-th/0207046.pdf | ||
<tabbox Researcher> | <tabbox Researcher> | ||
+ | |||
+ | --> Why isn't the Borel transformation applicable in QCD?# | ||
+ | |||
+ | See section 20.7 in Weinberg's QFT book Vol. 2. | ||
+ | |||
+ | " In quantum chromodynamics it is the renormalons that obstruct the use of the Borel transformation to sum the perturbation series [...] [T]here are instanton solutions in non Abelian gauge theories like quantum chromodynamics, but these also yield relatively harmless singularities of $B(z)$ on the negative real axis. the real problem in quantum chromodynamics is with a different class of singularities, known as renormalons. " | ||
+ | |||
+ | (Renormalons are due to the running of the gauge couplings and originate in diagrams that yield contributions that grow like $n!$. According to Weinberg, they are "associated with terms in the operator product expansion".) | ||
+ | |||
+ | <-- | ||
<note tip> | <note tip> |