User Tools

Site Tools


theories:speculative_theories:quantum_gravity

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Last revision Both sides next revision
theories:speculative_theories:quantum_gravity [2018/03/28 08:50]
jakobadmin ↷ Links adapted because of a move operation
theories:speculative_theories:quantum_gravity [2018/12/19 11:00]
jakobadmin ↷ Links adapted because of a move operation
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 <tabbox Intuitive> ​ <tabbox Intuitive> ​
-Quantum gravity is the generic term for theories that try to combine the principles of [[theories:quantum_theory|quantum theories]] with [[theories:​classical_theories:​general_relativity|general relativity]]. ​+Quantum gravity is the generic term for theories that try to combine the principles of [[theories:quantum_mechanics:​canonical|quantum theories]] with [[models:​general_relativity|general relativity]]. ​
  
-So far, no experimentally ​proven ​theory of quantum gravity exists.+So far, no experimentally ​verified ​theory of quantum gravity exists.
  
 ---- ----
  
-  * A great book on quantum gravity for layman ​is "Three Roads to Quantum Gravity"​ by Lee Smolin+  * A great book on quantum gravity for laypersons ​is "Three Roads to Quantum Gravity"​ by Lee Smolin
   ​   ​
 <tabbox Concrete> ​ <tabbox Concrete> ​
Line 25: Line 25:
   * [[https://​arxiv.org/​abs/​1010.5822|Gauge Gravity: a forward-looking introduction]] by Andrew Randono ​   * [[https://​arxiv.org/​abs/​1010.5822|Gauge Gravity: a forward-looking introduction]] by Andrew Randono ​
  
 +----
  
 +<​blockquote>​From a brief analysis of the standard Einstein-Hilbert action, we see that fluctuations of the metric at the Planck scale should become very violent, leading to potential changes in the topology of the spacetime [103, 104]. <​cite>​https://​arxiv.org/​abs/​1711.00864</​cite></​blockquote>​
  
 <tabbox Abstract> ​ <tabbox Abstract> ​
Line 36: Line 38:
 <tabbox Why is it interesting?> ​ <tabbox Why is it interesting?> ​
 <​blockquote>​ <​blockquote>​
-One of the big problems in physics — perhaps the biggest! — is figuring out how our two current best theories fit together. On the one hand we have the [[models:​standard_model|Standard Model]], which tries to explain all the forces except gravity, and takes quantum mechanics into account. ​ On the other hand we have [[theories:​classical_theories:​general_relativity|General Relativity]],​ which tries to explain gravity, and does not take [[theories:​quantum_mechanics|quantum mechanics]] into account. Both theories seem to be more or less on the right track — but until we somehow fit them together, or completely discard one or both, our picture of the world will be deeply schizophrenic.+One of the big problems in physics — perhaps the biggest! — is figuring out how our two current best theories fit together. On the one hand we have the [[models:​standard_model|Standard Model]], which tries to explain all the forces except gravity, and takes quantum mechanics into account. ​ On the other hand we have [[models:​general_relativity|General Relativity]],​ which tries to explain gravity, and does not take [[theories:​quantum_mechanics:canonical|quantum mechanics]] into account. Both theories seem to be more or less on the right track — but until we somehow fit them together, or completely discard one or both, our picture of the world will be deeply schizophrenic.
  
 It seems plausible that as a step in the right direction we should figure out a theory of gravity that takes quantum mechanics into account, but reduces to General Relativity when we ignore quantum effects (which should be small in many situations). This is what people mean by "​quantum gravity"​ — the quest for such a theory. It seems plausible that as a step in the right direction we should figure out a theory of gravity that takes quantum mechanics into account, but reduces to General Relativity when we ignore quantum effects (which should be small in many situations). This is what people mean by "​quantum gravity"​ — the quest for such a theory.
Line 43: Line 45:
  
  
-<​blockquote>​At the beginning of the XX century,[[theories:​classical_theories:​general_relativity| General Relativity]] (GR) and [[theories:​quantum_mechanics|Quantum Mechanics]] (QM) once+<​blockquote>​At the beginning of the XX century,[[models:​general_relativity| General Relativity]] (GR) and [[theories:​quantum_mechanics:canonical|Quantum Mechanics]] (QM) once
 again began reshaping our basic understanding of space and time and, respectively,​ matter, energy again began reshaping our basic understanding of space and time and, respectively,​ matter, energy
 and causality —arguably to a no lesser extent. But we have not been able to combine these new and causality —arguably to a no lesser extent. But we have not been able to combine these new
Line 66: Line 68:
 | Regge calculus ​               | Perturbative quantum gravity ​     | Finkelstein ​                       | Null surfaces ​             | [[theories:​speculative_theories:​lqg|Loop Quantum Gravity]] ​    | | Regge calculus ​               | Perturbative quantum gravity ​     | Finkelstein ​                       | Null surfaces ​             | [[theories:​speculative_theories:​lqg|Loop Quantum Gravity]] ​    |
 | Simplicial models ​            | QFT on curved space–times ​        | Twistors ​                          | Spin foam models ​          | [[theories:​speculative_theories:​asymptotic_safety|Asymptotic Safety]] ​                                             | | Simplicial models ​            | QFT on curved space–times ​        | Twistors ​                          | Spin foam models ​          | [[theories:​speculative_theories:​asymptotic_safety|Asymptotic Safety]] ​                                             |
-|                               ​| ​                                  ​| ​                                   |                            | [[theories:speculative_theories:​supergravity|Supergravity]]|+|                               ​| ​                                  ​| ​                                   |                            | [[models:speculative_models:​supergravity|Supergravity]]|
  
  
Line 72: Line 74:
  
 <tabbox FAQ> ​ <tabbox FAQ> ​
 +
  
 --> What's so difficult about Quantum Gravity?# --> What's so difficult about Quantum Gravity?#
Line 100: Line 103:
  
 <-- <--
 +-->Why is Gravity Non-Renormalizable?#​
  
 +see https://​arxiv.org/​abs/​0709.3555
 +<--
  
 <tabbox History> ​ <tabbox History> ​
theories/speculative_theories/quantum_gravity.txt · Last modified: 2020/04/03 16:50 by 95.168.180.148