User Tools

Site Tools


theories:classical_mechanics:hamiltonian

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
theories:classical_mechanics:hamiltonian [2018/05/05 14:03]
jakobadmin ↷ Page name changed from theories:classical_mechanics:hamiltonian_mechanics to theories:classical_mechanics:hamiltonian
theories:classical_mechanics:hamiltonian [2018/10/11 14:12] (current)
jakobadmin [Abstract]
Line 10: Line 10:
 <tabbox Concrete> ​ <tabbox Concrete> ​
  
-<note tip> +---- 
-In this section things should be explained by analogy and with pictures and, if necessary, some formulas. + 
-</​note>​ +**Reading Recommendations** 
- + 
 +  * The best book on Hamiltonian mechanics is The Lazy Universe by Coopersmith
 <tabbox Abstract> ​ <tabbox Abstract> ​
 Lagrangian mechanics can be formulated geometrically using [[advanced_tools:​fiber_bundles|fibre bundles]]. Lagrangian mechanics can be formulated geometrically using [[advanced_tools:​fiber_bundles|fibre bundles]].
Line 34: Line 35:
 ---- ----
  
 +  * [[https://​core.ac.uk/​download/​pdf/​4887416.pdf|Lectures on Mechanics]] by Marsden
   * See page 471 in Road to Reality by R. Penrose, page 167 in Geometric Methods of Mathematical Physics by B. Schutz and http://​philsci-archive.pitt.edu/​2362/​1/​Part1ButterfForBub.pdf. ​   * See page 471 in Road to Reality by R. Penrose, page 167 in Geometric Methods of Mathematical Physics by B. Schutz and http://​philsci-archive.pitt.edu/​2362/​1/​Part1ButterfForBub.pdf. ​
   * For some more backinfo why there is a symplectic structure in classical mechanics, have a look at https://​johncarlosbaez.wordpress.com/​2012/​01/​23/​classical-mechanics-versus-thermodynamics-part-2/​   * For some more backinfo why there is a symplectic structure in classical mechanics, have a look at https://​johncarlosbaez.wordpress.com/​2012/​01/​23/​classical-mechanics-versus-thermodynamics-part-2/​
Line 44: Line 46:
 a ‘Hamiltonian’ $$H : T^* Q \to \mathbb{R}$$ or a ‘Lagrangian’ $$L : T Q \to \mathbb{R}$$ a ‘Hamiltonian’ $$H : T^* Q \to \mathbb{R}$$ or a ‘Lagrangian’ $$L : T Q \to \mathbb{R}$$
  
-Instead, we started with Hamilton’s principal function $$S : Q \to \mathbb{R}$$ where $Q$ is not the usual configuration space describing possible positions for a particle, but the ‘extended’ configuration space, which also includes time. Only this way do Hamilton’s equations, like the [[equations:​maxwell_relations|Maxwell relations]],​ become a trivial consequence of the fact that partial derivatives commute.+Instead, we started with Hamilton’s principal function $$S : Q \to \mathbb{R}$$ where $Q$ is not the usual configuration space describing possible positions for a particle, but the ‘extended’ configuration space, which also includes time. Only this way do Hamilton’s equations, like the [[formulas:​maxwell_relations|Maxwell relations]],​ become a trivial consequence of the fact that partial derivatives commute.
  
 <​cite>​https://​johncarlosbaez.wordpress.com/​2012/​01/​23/​classical-mechanics-versus-thermodynamics-part-2/</​cite>​ <​cite>​https://​johncarlosbaez.wordpress.com/​2012/​01/​23/​classical-mechanics-versus-thermodynamics-part-2/</​cite>​
theories/classical_mechanics/hamiltonian.1525521797.txt.gz · Last modified: 2018/05/05 12:03 (external edit)