Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
theorems:haags_theorem [2018/03/28 15:24] jakobadmin |
theorems:haags_theorem [2019/05/08 15:48] (current) jakobadmin [Abstract] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
<tabbox Abstract> | <tabbox Abstract> | ||
- | <note tip> | + | <blockquote>In particular Haag's theorem, that one |
- | The motto in this section is: //the higher the level of abstraction, the better//. | + | cannot consistently define the vacuum in interacting theories, is now considered to have been the wrong way to look |
- | </note> | + | at the problem, and largely disappears with considerations of RG flow.<cite>[[http://www.felixflicker.com/pdf/QFT_notes_F_Flicker.pdf|A Practical Introduction to Quantum Field Theory]] by Felix Flicker</cite></blockquote> |
<tabbox Why is it interesting?> | <tabbox Why is it interesting?> | ||
Line 28: | Line 27: | ||
introduction to quantum Field theory" by Teller (1995) </cite> | introduction to quantum Field theory" by Teller (1995) </cite> | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <tabbox FAQ> | ||
+ | |||
+ | -->Why is there no problem in practical QFT calculations?# | ||
+ | see https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/3983/haags-theorem-and-practical-qft-computations | ||
+ | <-- | ||
</tabbox> | </tabbox> | ||