User Tools

Site Tools


models:thermodynamics

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
models:thermodynamics [2017/10/27 11:01]
jakobadmin ↷ Page moved from statistical_mechanics:thermodynamics to theories:statistical_mechanics:thermodynamics
models:thermodynamics [2018/12/19 11:01] (current)
jakobadmin ↷ Page moved from theories:thermodynamics to models:thermodynamics
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== Thermodynamics ====== ====== Thermodynamics ======
 + 
 +<tabbox Intuitive> ​
  
-<​tabbox ​Why is it interesting?​>  +  * https://​gravityandlevity.wordpress.com/​2010/​12/​07/​feynmans-ratchet-and-the-perpetual-motion-gambling-scheme/​ 
- +<​tabbox ​Concrete>  
-<tabbox Layman> ​+**Recommended Lecture Notes:**
  
-<note tip> +  * http://www.inference.org.uk/​sanjoy/​teaching/​thermo/
-Explanations in this section should contain no formulas, but instead colloquial things like you would hear them during a coffee break or at a cocktail party. +
-</note> +
-   +
-<tabbox Student> ​+
  
 **Recommended Papers:** **Recommended Papers:**
Line 15: Line 13:
   * Gibbs vs Boltzmann Entropies by E. T. Jaynes; especially the section ""​Intuitive meaning of the second law".   * Gibbs vs Boltzmann Entropies by E. T. Jaynes; especially the section ""​Intuitive meaning of the second law".
  
-**FAQ:** 
  
-  * What is the conceptual difference between Gibbs and Boltzmann entropies? 
-    * https://​physics.stackexchange.com/​questions/​141321/​what-is-the-conceptual-difference-between-gibbs-and-boltzmann-entropies 
-    * Gibbs vs Boltzmann Entropies by E. T. Jaynes; 
  
    
-<​tabbox ​Researcher+<​tabbox ​Abstract
  
 **Recommended Papers:** **Recommended Papers:**
Line 30: Line 24:
  
  
---Common Question 1#+<tabbox Why is it interesting?​
  
-  
-<-- 
  
---> Common Question 2# 
  
-  +<blockquote>
-<-- +
-   +
-<tabbox Examples+
  
---> Example1#+“….[classical thermodynamics] is the only physical theory of universal content which I am convinced will never be overthrown, within the framework of applicability of its basic concepts.“
  
-  +<​cite>​Einstein </​cite>​ 
-<--+</​blockquote>​
  
---Example2:#+<​blockquote>
  
- +“The law that entropy always increases holds, I think, the supreme position among the laws of Nature. If someone points out to you that your pet theory of the universe is in disagreement with Maxwell’s equations — then so much the worse for Maxwell’s equations. If it is found to be contradicted by observation — well, these experimentalists do bungle things sometimes. But if your theory is found to be against the second law of thermodynamics I can give you no hope; there is nothing for it but to collapse in deepest humiliation.“ 
 + 
 +<​cite>​Eddington </​cite>​ 
 +</​blockquote>​ 
 + 
 +<​blockquote>​ 
 +“If physical theories were people, thermodynamics would be the village witch,” the physicist Lídia del Rio and co-authors wrote last year in Journal of Physics A. “The other theories find her somewhat odd, somehow different in nature from the rest, yet everyone comes to her for advice, and no one dares to contradict her.” 
 + 
 +<​cite>​https://​www.quantamagazine.org/​the-quantum-thermodynamics-revolution-20170502/</​cite>​ 
 +</​blockquote>​ 
 + 
 +<tabbox FAQ> 
 + 
 + 
 +--> What is the conceptual difference between Gibbs and Boltzmann entropies?#​ 
 + 
 +See https://​physics.stackexchange.com/​questions/​141321/​what-is-the-conceptual-difference-between-gibbs-and-boltzmann-entropies and also Gibbs vs Boltzmann Entropies by E. T. Jaynes;
 <-- <--
-   +
-<tabbox History> ​+
  
 </​tabbox>​ </​tabbox>​
  
  
models/thermodynamics.1509094860.txt.gz · Last modified: 2017/12/04 08:01 (external edit)