Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- models:speculative_models:axion [2018/02/23 17:07]
jakobadmin [Layman]
+++ models:speculative_models:axion [2019/07/01 09:27] (current)
jakobadmin [Criticism]
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-====== Axion Theories ======
+====== Axion Models ======
-<tabbox Why is it interesting?>
-Axions are proposed as a solution to the [[open_problems:strong_cp_problem|strong CP problem]]. In some sense, it's the simplest solution, because the QCD vacuum energy has a minimum at $\bar{\theta}=0$ and the axion allows the vacuum to relax to this ground state. Without the axion the QCD vacuum is frozen and $\bar{\theta}$ is therefore fixed at some not-necessarily minimum value.
-<tabbox Layman>
+<tabbox Intuitive>
-  * A great laymen discussion of the axion mechanism is [[https://www.susanjfowler.com/blog/2016/9/17/from-the-fledgling-physicist-archives-an-introduction-to-axions|From The Fledgling Physicist Archives: An Introduction To Axions]] by Susan J Fowler.
+  * A great laymen discussion of the axion mechanism is [[https://www.susanjfowler.com/blog/2016/9/17/from-the-fledgling-physicist-archives-an-introduction-to-axions|An Introduction To Axions]] by Susan J Fowler.
 ----
@@ Line 31: / Line 29: @@
 </blockquote>
-<tabbox Student>
+<tabbox Concrete>
+  * A really great and short introduction is [[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1631070511002039|The strong CP problem by Pierre Sikivie]]
   * [[https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.03018|Axions and ALPs: a very short introduction]] by David J. E. Marsh
-<tabbox Researcher>
+<tabbox Abstract>
   * [[https://arxiv.org/abs/1511.02867|The QCD axion, precisely]] by Giovanni Grilli di Cortona, Edward Hardy, Javier Pardo Vega, Giovanni Villadoro
-<tabbox Examples>
---> Example1#
+<tabbox Why is it interesting?>
-<--
---> Example2:#
+Axions are proposed as a solution to the [[open_problems:strong_cp_puzzle|strong CP problem]]. In some sense, it's the simplest solution, because the QCD vacuum energy has a minimum at $\bar{\theta}=0$ and the axion allows the vacuum to relax to this ground state. Without the axion the QCD vacuum is frozen and $\bar{\theta}$ is therefore fixed at some not-necessarily minimum value.
-<--
-<tabbox FAQ>
 <tabbox History>
-For a great discussion of the history of axion models, see Axions: Past, Present, and Future by Mark Srednicki
+For a great discussion of the history of axion models, see [[https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0210172|Axions: Past, Present, and Future]] by Mark Srednicki
+----
 <blockquote>
@@ Line 63: / Line 59: @@
 <tabbox Criticism>
+<blockquote>
+It may strike the reader (and has struck the author) that
+enormous theoretical superstructures are here being erected upon
+a very narrow foundation.
+The whole superstructure of axions could
+be made obsolete if a good alternative approach to the problem of
+strong CP invariance were found.
+Even if this does happen, I am
+confident that techniques for dealing with approximate Nambu-
+Goldstone bosons and their phenomenological (including cosmological)
+implications will be of enduring interest -- so I won't be completely wasting your time.<cite>THE U(1) PROBLEM:
+INSTANTONS, AXIONS, AND FAMILONS by
+Frank Wilczek </cite></blockquote>
 <blockquote>
@@ Line 111: / Line 123: @@
 <cite>[[https://arxiv.org/pdf/1608.08969.pdf|Domestic Axion]] Gia Dvali</cite>
 </blockquote>
+<blockquote>The notion of Peccei–Quinn (PQ) symmetry may seem contrived. Why should there be a U(1) symmetry which is broken at the quantum level but which is exact at the classical level? However, the reason for PQ symmetry may be deeper than we know at present. String theory contains many examples of symmetries which are exact classically but which are broken by quantum anomalies, including PQ symmetry [17–19]. Within field theory, there are examples of theories with automatic PQ symmetry, i.e. where PQ symmetry is a consequence of just the particle content of the theory without adjustment of parameters to special values. <cite>[[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1631070511002039|The strong CP problem by Pierre Sikivie]]</cite></blockquote>
+<blockquote>There, a global U(1) symmetry (the PQ symmetry) which is almost exact but broken by the axial anomaly of QCD plays a crucial role. After spontaneous breaking, the effective θ-angle of QCD is cancelled by the vacuum expectation value (VEV) of the associated pseudo Nambu-Goldstone boson, the axion a. The origin of such a convenient global symmetry is, however, quite puzzling from the theoretical point of view in many aspects. By definition, the PQ symmetry is not an exact symmetry. Besides, the postulation of global symmetries is not comfortable in the sense of general relativity. It is also argued that all global symmetries are broken by quantum gravity effects [5–10]. If we
+could regard the PQ symmetry as a U(1) gauge symmetry, there would be no suspicion about the exactness and
+the consistency with quantum gravity. The PQ symmetry is, however, broken by the QCD anomaly, and hence,
+it cannot be a consistent gauge symmetry as it is. <cite>https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.01112</cite></blockquote>
 </tabbox>

User Tools

Site Tools

Differences

Page Tools