User Tools

Site Tools


formalisms

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
formalisms [2018/05/06 09:20]
jakobadmin
formalisms [2020/04/02 20:08] (current)
184.147.122.3
Line 11: Line 11:
   * The Schrödinger formalism, where we describe the system in terms of abstract vectors living in [[basic_tools:​hilbert_space|Hilbert space]]. ​   * The Schrödinger formalism, where we describe the system in terms of abstract vectors living in [[basic_tools:​hilbert_space|Hilbert space]]. ​
  
-Each formalism has strengths and weaknesses. Which one is better depends on the system we wish to describe. +Each formalism has strengths and weaknesses ​and which one is better depends on the system we wish to describe.
  
 ---- ----
Line 20: Line 19:
  
 ^ Lagrangian formalism ​                                                                                                                                             ^ Hamiltonian formalism ​                                                                                                                              ^ ^ Lagrangian formalism ​                                                                                                                                             ^ Hamiltonian formalism ​                                                                                                                              ^
-| We describe the state of a system with $n$ degrees of freedom with the $n$ coordinates $(q_1,​\ldots,​ q_n)$ and the $n$ velocities $(\dot{q}_1,​\ldots , \dot{q}_n)$ ​ | We describe the state the a system with $n$ degrees of freedom by the $n$ coordinates $(q_1,​\ldots,​ q_n)$ and the $n$ momenta $(p_1,​\ldots , p_n)$  |+| We describe the state of a system with $n$ degrees of freedom with the $n$ coordinates $(q_1,​\ldots,​ q_n)$ and the $n$ velocities $(\dot{q}_1,​\ldots , \dot{q}_n)$ ​ | We describe the state of a system with $n$ degrees of freedom by the $n$ coordinates $(q_1,​\ldots,​ q_n)$ and the $n$ momenta $(p_1,​\ldots , p_n)$  |
 | We represent the //state// of the system by a point moving with a definite velocity in an $n$-dimensional configuration space | We represent the //state// of the system by a point moving with a definite velocity in an $2n$-dimensional phase space with coordinates $(q_1,​\ldots,​ q_n; p_1,\ldots , p_n)$ | | We represent the //state// of the system by a point moving with a definite velocity in an $n$-dimensional configuration space | We represent the //state// of the system by a point moving with a definite velocity in an $2n$-dimensional phase space with coordinates $(q_1,​\ldots,​ q_n; p_1,\ldots , p_n)$ |
 | The $n$ configuration space coordinates evolve according to $n$ second-order equations | The $2n$ phase space coordinates evolve according to $2n$ first-order equations | | The $n$ configuration space coordinates evolve according to $n$ second-order equations | The $2n$ phase space coordinates evolve according to $2n$ first-order equations |
Line 49: Line 48:
  
 $$ m \frac{d^2}{dt^2} x=-kx , $$ $$ m \frac{d^2}{dt^2} x=-kx , $$
-wher $x$ denotes the position of the object and $k$ the spring constant that characterises the mechanical spring. (This is known as Hooke'​s law.)+where $x$ denotes the position of the object and $k$ the spring constant that characterises the mechanical spring. (This is known as Hooke'​s law.)
  
  
formalisms.1525591246.txt.gz · Last modified: 2018/05/06 07:20 (external edit)