Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
basic_notions:fundamental_constants [2017/12/04 08:01] 127.0.0.1 external edit |
basic_notions:fundamental_constants [2022/09/12 21:12] (current) 207.34.115.128 [Concrete] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====== Fundamental Constants ====== | ====== Fundamental Constants ====== | ||
- | <tabbox Why is it interesting?> | ||
- | <tabbox Layman> | + | <tabbox Intuitive> |
<note tip> | <note tip> | ||
Line 9: | Line 8: | ||
</note> | </note> | ||
| | ||
- | <tabbox Student> | + | <tabbox Concrete> |
<note tip> | <note tip> | ||
In this section things should be explained by analogy and with pictures and, if necessary, some formulas. | In this section things should be explained by analogy and with pictures and, if necessary, some formulas. | ||
</note> | </note> | ||
- | + | * [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bng-VQl66a0&list=PLFdjtNRUXClhY1ZnwPowKYFeTJgdcv5vz&index=2&t=2s| Constants of Nature: The Royal Road to Fundamental Physics]] by Dr. Alexander Unzicker, PhD | |
- | <tabbox Researcher> | + | <tabbox Abstract> |
Trialogue on the number of fundamental constants by M. J. Duff, L. B. Okun, G. Veneziano: | Trialogue on the number of fundamental constants by M. J. Duff, L. B. Okun, G. Veneziano: | ||
Line 21: | Line 20: | ||
<blockquote>This paper consists of three separate articles on the number of fundamental dimensionful constants in physics. We started our debate in summer 1992 on the terrace of the famous CERN cafeteria. In the summer of 2001 we returned to the subject to find that our views still diverged and decided to explain our current positions. LBO develops the traditional approach with three constants, GV argues in favor of at most two (within superstring theory), while MJD advocates zero.</blockquote> | <blockquote>This paper consists of three separate articles on the number of fundamental dimensionful constants in physics. We started our debate in summer 1992 on the terrace of the famous CERN cafeteria. In the summer of 2001 we returned to the subject to find that our views still diverged and decided to explain our current positions. LBO develops the traditional approach with three constants, GV argues in favor of at most two (within superstring theory), while MJD advocates zero.</blockquote> | ||
- | --> Common Question 1# | + | <tabbox Why is it interesting?> |
- | |||
- | <-- | ||
- | |||
- | --> Common Question 2# | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | <-- | ||
- | | ||
- | <tabbox Examples> | ||
- | |||
- | --> Example1# | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | <-- | ||
- | |||
- | --> Example2:# | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | <-- | ||
- | | ||
- | <tabbox History> | ||
</tabbox> | </tabbox> | ||