Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
advanced_tools:stacks [2017/11/08 18:04] jakobadmin [Researcher] |
advanced_tools:stacks [2017/11/09 09:52] (current) jakobadmin [History] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
by Grothendieck in the second half of the 20th century and as | by Grothendieck in the second half of the 20th century and as | ||
witnessed by a multitude of modern developments, a more natural mathematical | witnessed by a multitude of modern developments, a more natural mathematical | ||
- | description of many phenomena in geometry is obtained by re- | + | description of many phenomena in geometry is obtained by refining from traditional geometric spaces to more refined kinds of spaces |
- | fining from traditional geometric spaces to more refined kinds of spaces | + | |
known as “stacks”. | known as “stacks”. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [...] | ||
+ | |||
+ | Our main motivation to consider sheaves and stacks is to provide a nonperturbative | ||
+ | framework in which we can do physics. Much of gauge theory is | ||
+ | done in perturbation theory, but in fact **non-perturbative effects** such as Dirac | ||
+ | monopoles and Yang-Mills instantons play a crucial role in fundamental physics | ||
+ | [5]. **The language of stacks is the natural language for these phenomena.** | ||
+ | |||
<cite>https://ncatlab.org/schreiber/files/Eggertsson2014.pdf</cite></blockquote> | <cite>https://ncatlab.org/schreiber/files/Eggertsson2014.pdf</cite></blockquote> | ||
Line 47: | Line 55: | ||
| | ||
<tabbox History> | <tabbox History> | ||
+ | The idea of using stacks goes back to a manuscript titled Pursuing Stacks by Alexander Grothendieck in 1983. For some more information, see https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Pursuing+Stacks | ||
</tabbox> | </tabbox> | ||