Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
advanced_tools:spinors [2018/12/16 17:08] jakobadmin [Why is it interesting?] |
advanced_tools:spinors [2022/09/07 21:52] (current) 147.92.69.196 [FAQ] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
* A nice introduction is [[https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.3824|An introduction to spinors]] by Andrew M. Steane | * A nice introduction is [[https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.3824|An introduction to spinors]] by Andrew M. Steane | ||
+ | * [[http://www.weylmann.com/spinor.pdf|A Child’s Guide to Spinors]] by William O. Straub | ||
* See also http://www-personal.umich.edu/~williams/notes/spinor.pdf | * See also http://www-personal.umich.edu/~williams/notes/spinor.pdf | ||
* https://users.physics.ox.ac.uk/~Steane/teaching/rel_C_spinors.pdf | * https://users.physics.ox.ac.uk/~Steane/teaching/rel_C_spinors.pdf | ||
Line 76: | Line 77: | ||
<blockquote>No one fully understands spinors. Their algebra is formally understood, but their geometrical significance is mysterious. | <blockquote>No one fully understands spinors. Their algebra is formally understood, but their geometrical significance is mysterious. | ||
- | In some sense they describe the ‘‘square root’’ of geometry and, just as understanding the concept of p | + | In some sense they describe the ‘‘square root’’ of geometry and, just as understanding the concept of $\sqrt{-1}$ took centuries, |
- | −1 took centuries, | + | |
the same might be true of spinors. <cite>Sir Michael Atiyah</cite></blockquote> | the same might be true of spinors. <cite>Sir Michael Atiyah</cite></blockquote> | ||
Line 90: | Line 90: | ||
<cite>Student Friendly Quantum Field Theory by Klauber</cite></blockquote> | <cite>Student Friendly Quantum Field Theory by Klauber</cite></blockquote> | ||
+ | |||
+ | * [[https://geocalc.clas.asu.edu/pdf/SPINORPM.pdf| Spinor Particle Mechanics]] by David Hestenes | ||
<-- | <-- |