advanced_tools:spinors
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
|
advanced_tools:spinors [2018/03/30 14:51] jakobadmin [Concrete] |
advanced_tools:spinors [2018/12/16 17:08] jakobadmin [Why is it interesting?] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| <tabbox Intuitive> | <tabbox Intuitive> | ||
| - | A spinor is a mathematical object similar to a [[basic_tools:vector_calculus|vector]]. However, while a vector points in some spatial direction, like, for example, in the direction of the north pole, a spinor points in a direction in an [[advanced_tools:internal_symmetries|internal space]]. | + | A spinor is a mathematical object similar to a [[basic_tools:vector_calculus|vector]]. However, while a vector points in some spatial direction, like, for example, in the direction of the north pole, a spinor points in a direction in an [[advanced_tools:internal_symmetry|internal space]]. |
| A curious property of a spinor is that if you rotate it by 360° it isn't the same but get's a minus sign. Only after a rotation by 720° a spinor is again the same. In contrast a vector is completely unchanged if you rotate it by 360°. | A curious property of a spinor is that if you rotate it by 360° it isn't the same but get's a minus sign. Only after a rotation by 720° a spinor is again the same. In contrast a vector is completely unchanged if you rotate it by 360°. | ||
| Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
| <cite>[[https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.3824|An introduction to spinors]] by Andrew M. Steane</cite> | <cite>[[https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.3824|An introduction to spinors]] by Andrew M. Steane</cite> | ||
| </blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <blockquote>No one fully understands spinors. Their algebra is formally understood, but their geometrical significance is mysterious. | ||
| + | In some sense they describe the ‘‘square root’’ of geometry and, just as understanding the concept of p | ||
| + | −1 took centuries, | ||
| + | the same might be true of spinors. <cite>Sir Michael Atiyah</cite></blockquote> | ||
advanced_tools/spinors.txt · Last modified: 2022/09/07 21:52 by 147.92.69.196
Page Tools
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International
