User Tools

Site Tools


advanced_tools:mass_insertion_approximation

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

advanced_tools:mass_insertion_approximation [2017/12/04 08:01]
advanced_tools:mass_insertion_approximation [2017/11/01 11:16] (current)
jakobadmin ↷ Links adapted because of a move operation
Line 1: Line 1:
 +====== Mass Insertion Approximation ======
  
 +<​blockquote>​
 +
 +Chirality is not well-defined for massive fields. A famous consequence of this fact are pion masses, which can be linked to [[advanced_notions:​symmetry_breaking:​chiral_symmetry_breaking|Chiral Symmetry Breaking]].
 +
 +In the Lagrangian, you can define left- and right-handed Weyl fermions independently. A mass term will mix these, giving a massive Dirac fermion. Weyl fermions fulfill either
 +$$ P_{L} \psi_L = \psi_L, \quad \text{or} \quad  P_R \psi_R = \psi_R$$
 +but a Dirac fermion is not an eigenstate of the projection operators
 +$$ P_{L,R} \psi_D \neq \alpha \psi_D. $$
 +
 +There is a computational trick called a "mass insertion",​ which can be confusing in this regard:
 +
 +A Dirac fermion can be considered as a coupled system of two Weyl fermions, where the mass is the coupling parameter.
 +If a fermion'​s mass is small compared to the energy of a given process, one can approximate the Dirac fermion by its two (massless) Weyl components.
 +The advantage is that for massless fields, loop integrals usually take much simpler forms.
 +
 +Corrections to the massless case can then be included by adding a Feynman rule for the mass term in the Lagrangian, which is a bilinear coupling between the left- and right-handed Weyl fermions.
 +If you were to resum all possible mass insertions, the result is the same as if you had started with the massive Dirac fermion from the start.
 +Since the underlying assumption of the approximation is that the mass is small compared to other energy scales in the theory, the corrections are usually small, though.
 +
 +Sometimes, the diagram including a mass insertion is computed in order to show that the error induced by neglecting the mass is small indeed.
 +
 +  ​
 +  ​
 +<​cite>​https://​physics.stackexchange.com/​a/​298904/​37286</​cite></​blockquote>​