This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
advanced_tools:mass_insertion_approximation [2017/09/29 09:42] jakobadmin created |
advanced_tools:mass_insertion_approximation [2017/12/04 08:01] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | ====== Mass Insertion Approximation ====== | ||
- | <blockquote> | ||
- | |||
- | Chirality is not well-defined for massive fields. A famous consequence of this fact are pion masses, which can be linked to [[symmetry_breaking:chiral_symmetry_breaking|Chiral Symmetry Breaking]]. | ||
- | |||
- | In the Lagrangian, you can define left- and right-handed Weyl fermions independently. A mass term will mix these, giving a massive Dirac fermion. Weyl fermions fulfill either | ||
- | $$ P_{L} \psi_L = \psi_L, \quad \text{or} \quad P_R \psi_R = \psi_R$$ | ||
- | but a Dirac fermion is not an eigenstate of the projection operators | ||
- | $$ P_{L,R} \psi_D \neq \alpha \psi_D. $$ | ||
- | |||
- | There is a computational trick called a "mass insertion", which can be confusing in this regard: | ||
- | |||
- | A Dirac fermion can be considered as a coupled system of two Weyl fermions, where the mass is the coupling parameter. | ||
- | If a fermion's mass is small compared to the energy of a given process, one can approximate the Dirac fermion by its two (massless) Weyl components. | ||
- | The advantage is that for massless fields, loop integrals usually take much simpler forms. | ||
- | |||
- | Corrections to the massless case can then be included by adding a Feynman rule for the mass term in the Lagrangian, which is a bilinear coupling between the left- and right-handed Weyl fermions. | ||
- | If you were to resum all possible mass insertions, the result is the same as if you had started with the massive Dirac fermion from the start. | ||
- | Since the underlying assumption of the approximation is that the mass is small compared to other energy scales in the theory, the corrections are usually small, though. | ||
- | |||
- | Sometimes, the diagram including a mass insertion is computed in order to show that the error induced by neglecting the mass is small indeed. | ||
- | |||
- | | ||
- | | ||
- | <cite>https://physics.stackexchange.com/a/298904/37286</cite></blockquote> |