This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
advanced_tools:laplace_transformation [2017/12/04 08:01] |
advanced_tools:laplace_transformation [2017/10/22 17:56] (current) jakobadmin created |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | ====== Laplace Transformation ====== | ||
+ | |||
+ | <tabbox Why is it interesting?> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <tabbox Layman> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <note tip> | ||
+ | Explanations in this section should contain no formulas, but instead colloquial things like you would hear them during a coffee break or at a cocktail party. | ||
+ | </note> | ||
+ | | ||
+ | <tabbox Student> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <blockquote>" Ever study finance, John? It made a lot more sense to me once I understood that the net present value of a future cash flow is simply one particular value of the Laplace transform of that cash flow, the value corresponding to the selected discount rate. "<cite>https://johncarlosbaez.wordpress.com/2012/01/19/classical-mechanics-versus-thermodynamics-part-1/</cite></blockquote> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <tabbox Researcher> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <note tip> | ||
+ | The motto in this section is: //the higher the level of abstraction, the better//. | ||
+ | </note> | ||
+ | |||
+ | --> Common Question 1# | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <-- | ||
+ | |||
+ | --> Common Question 2# | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <-- | ||
+ | | ||
+ | <tabbox Examples> | ||
+ | |||
+ | --> Example1# | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <-- | ||
+ | |||
+ | --> Example2:# | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <-- | ||
+ | | ||
+ | <tabbox History> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </tabbox> | ||
+ | |||