advanced_tools:internal_symmetry
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
advanced_tools:internal_symmetry [2018/04/15 09:35] jakobadmin [Why is it interesting?] |
advanced_tools:internal_symmetry [2019/01/24 10:19] (current) jakobadmin [Intuitive] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ====== Internal Symmetry ====== | ====== Internal Symmetry ====== | ||
| - | <tabbox Why is it interesting?> | + | //see also [[basic_tools:symmetry]] and [[advanced_tools:gauge_symmetry]]// |
| + | |||
| + | <tabbox Intuitive> | ||
| <blockquote>You are sitting in a room with a friend and a ping-pong ball (perfectly spherical and perfectly white— the ping-pong ball, not the friend). The conversation gets around to Newtonian mechanics. You toss the ball to your friend. | <blockquote>You are sitting in a room with a friend and a ping-pong ball (perfectly spherical and perfectly white— the ping-pong ball, not the friend). The conversation gets around to Newtonian mechanics. You toss the ball to your friend. | ||
| Both of you agree that, given the speed and direction of the toss, F = m A | Both of you agree that, given the speed and direction of the toss, F = m A | ||
| Line 57: | Line 59: | ||
| <cite>page 22ff in Topology, Geometry and Gauge fields by Naber</cite> | <cite>page 22ff in Topology, Geometry and Gauge fields by Naber</cite> | ||
| </blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
| - | <tabbox Layman> | ||
| Line 63: | Line 64: | ||
| <cite>Deep Down Things by Schumm></cite></blockquote> | <cite>Deep Down Things by Schumm></cite></blockquote> | ||
| - | <tabbox Student> | + | <blockquote>„What the heck is an internal space?” you ask. Good question. The best answer I have is “useful.” It’s what we invented to quantify the observed behavior of particles, a mathematical tool that helps us make predictions. |
| + | “Yes, but is it real?” you want to know. Uh-oh. Depends on whom you ask. Some of my colleagues indeed believe that the math of our theories, like those internal spaces, is real. Personally, I prefer to merely say it describes reality, leaving open whether or not the math itself is real. How math connects to reality is a mystery that plagued philosophers long before there were scientists, and we aren’t any wiser today. But luckily we can use the math without solving the mystery. | ||
| + | |||
| + | <cite>Lost in Math by Sabine Hossenfelder</cite> | ||
| + | </blockquote> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | <tabbox Concrete> | ||
| <note tip> | <note tip> | ||
| Line 69: | Line 77: | ||
| </note> | </note> | ||
| - | <tabbox Researcher> | + | <tabbox Abstract> |
| <note tip> | <note tip> | ||
| Line 76: | Line 84: | ||
| | | ||
| - | <tabbox Examples> | + | <tabbox Why is it interesting?> |
| - | + | Internal symmetries are powerful that we use, for example, to derive the correct Lagrangians describing fundamental interactions. | |
| - | --> Example1# | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | <-- | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | --> Example2:# | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | <-- | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | <tabbox FAQ> | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | <tabbox History> | + | |
| </tabbox> | </tabbox> | ||
advanced_tools/internal_symmetry.1523777706.txt.gz · Last modified: 2018/04/15 07:35 (external edit) · Currently locked by: 162.158.167.52,3.14.141.228
Page Tools
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International
