User Tools

Site Tools


advanced_tools:hodge_dual

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
advanced_tools:hodge_dual [2023/03/04 20:40]
edi [Concrete]
advanced_tools:hodge_dual [2023/03/19 21:35] (current)
edi [Concrete]
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 <tabbox Intuitive> ​ <tabbox Intuitive> ​
-The Hodge dual, also known as the Hodge star operator ($\star$), in $n$-dimensional space takes an antisymmetric rank-$p$ tensor and maps it to an antisymmetric rank-($n-p$) tensor.+The Hodge dual, also known as the Hodge star operator ($\star$), in $n$-dimensional space takes an antisymmetric rank-$p$ tensor and maps it to an antisymmetric rank-($n-p$) tensor. If we picture the rank-$p$ tensor as a $p$-dimensional volume element, the Hodge dual can be pictured as its orthogonal complement.
  
-Example #1: In Euclidean 3D space ($n=3$), the Hodge dual of the antisymmetric rank-2 tensor $a \wedge b$ is a vector, thus mapping rank $p=2$ to $p=3-2=1$. In this case, the resulting vector is just the ordinary cross product: $\star (a \wedge b) = a \times b$.+Example #1: In Euclidean 3D space ($n=3$), the Hodge dual of the antisymmetric rank-2 tensor $a \wedge b$ is a vector, thus mapping rank $p=2$ to $p=3-2=1$. In this case, the resulting vector is just the ordinary cross product: $\star (a \wedge b) = a \times b$. (For the meaning of $a \wedge b$, see [[advanced_tools:​exterior_product|Exterior Product]].)
  
 Example #2: In Euclidean 3D space ($n=3$), the Hodge dual of the antisymmetric rank-3 tensor $a \wedge b \wedge c$ is a scalar, thus mapping rank $p=3$ to $p=3-3=0$. In this case, the resulting scalar is just the scalar triple product: $\star (a \wedge b \wedge c) = a \times b \cdot c$. Example #2: In Euclidean 3D space ($n=3$), the Hodge dual of the antisymmetric rank-3 tensor $a \wedge b \wedge c$ is a scalar, thus mapping rank $p=3$ to $p=3-3=0$. In this case, the resulting scalar is just the scalar triple product: $\star (a \wedge b \wedge c) = a \times b \cdot c$.
  
-Example #3: In 4D space ($n=4$), the Hodge dual of an antisymmetric rank-2 tensor is again an antisymmetric rank-2 tensor ($4-2=2$). This is the reason why self-dual and anti-self-dual tensors exist in 4D.+Example #3: In 4D space ($n=4$), the Hodge dual of an antisymmetric rank-2 tensor is again an antisymmetric rank-2 tensor ($p=4-2=2$). This is the reason why self-dual ​($\star T=T$) and anti-self-dual ​($\star T = -T$) tensors exist in 4D.
  
  
   ​   ​
 <tabbox Concrete> ​ <tabbox Concrete> ​
-In we increase the rank of a general tensor ​is has more and more components. For example in 4D space a rank-0 tensor (= scalar) has 1 component, a rank-1 tensor (= vector) has 4 components, a rank-2 tensor has 4x4=16 components, a rank-3 tensor has 4x4x4=64 components, and a rank-4 tensor has 4x4x4x4=256 components.+If we increase the rank of a general tensor ​it acquires ​more and more components. For example in 4D space a rank-0 tensor (= scalar) has 1 component, a rank-1 tensor (= vector) has 4 components, a rank-2 tensor has 4x4=16 components, a rank-3 tensor has 4x4x4=64 components, and a rank-4 tensor has 4x4x4x4=256 components.
  
-The situation changes completely if we consider (totally) antisymmetric tensors instead of general tensors. Now the number of independent components increases ​as first but the decreases again. For example in 4D space a rank-0 tensor ​(= scalar) ​has 1 component, a rank-1 tensor ​(= vector) ​has 4 components, a rank-2 tensor has 6 components, a rank-3 tensor has 4 components, and a rank-4 tensor has just 1 component.+The situation changes completely if we consider (totally) antisymmetric tensors instead of general tensors. Now the number of independent components increases ​at first but then decreases again. For example in 4D space a rank-0 tensor has 1 component, a rank-1 tensor has 4 components, a rank-2 tensor has 6 components, a rank-3 tensor has 4 components, and a rank-4 tensor has just 1 component. Notice the pattern: 1 4 6 4 1.
  
 This pattern suggests a relationship between antisymmetric rank-$p$ tensors and and antisymmetric rank-($4-p$) tensors in 4D space. This is the idea behind the Hodge dual! The diagram below shows this pattern for 2, 3, and 4-dimensional spaces.  ​ This pattern suggests a relationship between antisymmetric rank-$p$ tensors and and antisymmetric rank-($4-p$) tensors in 4D space. This is the idea behind the Hodge dual! The diagram below shows this pattern for 2, 3, and 4-dimensional spaces.  ​
  
-For a more detailed explanation of this picture see [[https://​esackinger.wordpress.com/​|Fun with Symmetry]].+For a more detailed explanation of this picture see [[https://​esackinger.wordpress.com/​blog/​lie-groups-and-their-representations/#​hodge_dual|Fun with Symmetry]].
  
 [{{ :​advanced_tools:​hodge_dual.jpg?​nolink }}] [{{ :​advanced_tools:​hodge_dual.jpg?​nolink }}]
advanced_tools/hodge_dual.1677958815.txt.gz ยท Last modified: 2023/03/04 20:40 by edi