Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- advanced_tools:group_theory:representation_theory:dual_representation [2022/07/03 20:22]
edi [Intuitive]
+++ advanced_tools:group_theory:representation_theory:dual_representation [2023/02/23 02:18]
edi [Intuitive]
@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 <tabbox Intuitive>
-For any representation, we can construct a dual representation. To do that we let the representation act on the dual vector space instead of the original vector space. The dual vector space contains covectors, that is, linear functions that map vectors to scalars.
+For any representation, there is a dual representation, which acts on the dual vector space instead of the original vector space. The elements of the dual vector space are covectors, which are linear functions from the vectors to scalars.
-In some cases, the dual representation is equivalent to the original one (e.g. for representations with orthogonal matrices).
+For representations with orthogonal matrices, the dual representation is the same as the original representation.
-For unitary representations, the dual representation is also the complex-conjugate representation.
+For unitary representations, the dual representation is the same as the complex-conjugate representation.
+The dual of the defining representation of the Lorentz group is the parity-reversed representation.
 <tabbox Concrete>
 **Example**
-The diagram below shows the defining representation of $SU(2)$ in its upper branch. To construct the dual representation, we let it act on the dual vector space, that is, the space of covectors. In this example, the dual representation is the same as the complex-conjugate representation.
+The diagram below shows the defining representation of $SU(2)$ in its upper branch. To construct the dual representation, we let it act on the dual vector space, that is, the space of covectors. In this example, the dual representation is the same as the complex-conjugate representation ($\tilde{U}=U^*$). Moreover, the defining and complex-conjugate representations of $SU(2)$ are equivalent, that is, there is a similarity transformation that takes one to the other.
 [{{ :advanced_tools:group_theory:representation_theory:su2_dual.jpg?nolink }}]

User Tools

Site Tools

Differences

Page Tools