✎ Stueckelberg Trick [The Physics Travel Guide]

Edit the page and hit Save. See Formatting Syntax for Wiki syntax. Please edit the page only if you can improve it. If you want to test some things, learn to make your first steps on the playground.

====== Stueckelberg Trick ======

<note tip>
Explanations in this section should contain no formulas, but instead colloquial things like you would hear them during a coffee break or at a cocktail party.
</note>
  
<tabbox Student>

<blockquote>[W]e review the implementation of the Stückelberg trick in the theory of massive $SU(N)$ YM gauge bosons which, for simplicity, all have the same mass $m$,
\begin{align}
\mathcal{L}&=-\frac{1}{4g^{2}}{\rm tr}F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu}-\frac{m^{2}}{2g^{2}}{\rm tr} A_{\mu}A^{\mu}\ .\label{MassiveYMforStuckelbergSection} \tag{ 3.22}
\end{align}

This lagrangian is not gauge invariant, but gauge invariance can be restored by coupling in new fields, $\pi^{a}(x)$, with $a\in\{1,\ldots,N^2-1\}$, i.e. , one field for each generator of $SU(N)$.  In order to insert the $\pi^{a}(x)$'s appropriately, one first performs a gauge transformation with $\pi^{a}(x)$ as the gauge parameter,
\begin{align}
A_{\mu}&\longmapsto U^\dagger(\pi)(A_{\mu}+\partial_{\mu})U(\pi)\equiv A'_{\mu}\\
F_{\mu\nu}&\longmapsto U^\dagger(\pi) F_{\mu\nu}U(\pi)\equiv F'_{\mu\nu}\label{StuckelbergTransformationExample}
\end{align}
where $U(\pi)=e^{\pi^{a}(x)T_{a}}$ is an element of $SU(N)$.  We then define a new lagrangian $\mathcal{L}'$ by taking \eqref{MassiveYMforStuckelbergSection} and replacing $A_{\mu}\mapsto A_{\mu}'$ and $F_{\mu\nu}\mapsto F_{\mu\nu}'$.  That is,
\begin{align}
\mathcal{L}'&=-\frac{1}{4g^{2}}{\rm tr}F'_{\mu\nu}F'^{\mu\nu}-\frac{m^{2}}{2g^{2}}{\rm tr}A'_{\mu}A'^{\nu}\\
&=\!-\frac{1}{4g^{2}}\!{\rm tr}F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu}\!-\!\frac{m^{2}}{2g^{2}} {\rm tr}D_{\mu}U(\pi)D^{\mu}U^\dagger(\pi)~, \label{StuckelbergedLagrangianEx}
\end{align}
where $D_{\mu}U(\pi)= \partial_{\mu}U(\pi)+A_{\mu}U(\pi)$ is the gauge covariant derivative of $U(\pi)$.  The lagrangian $\mathcal{L}'$ then enjoys a gauge symmetry under which we simultaneously change
\begin{align}
A_{\mu}&\longmapsto V^\dagger(x)(A_{\mu}+ {1}\partial_{\mu})V(x) \\
U(\pi)&\longmapsto V^\dagger(x)U(\pi)~,
\end{align}
where $V(x)\in SU(N)$.

**The physics of the $\mathcal{L}$ and $\mathcal{L}'$ lagrangians is the same, we have just made the degrees of freedom in Eq. (3.22) manifest.  In $\mathcal{L}'$, we introduced $N^{2}-1$ new fields, but also restored $N^{2}-1$ gauge symmetries and hence degree of freedom counting is the same for both cases. We can demonstrate the equivalence explicitly by using the gauge symmetry of $\mathcal{L}'$ to go ``unitary gauge" in which we set $U(\pi)\to {1}$, where the two lagrangians coincide.  
**

The above process and its generalizations are known collectively as the Stückelberg trick, which is often a useful tool for elucidating the physics in certain regimes of theories, especially at high energies.

<cite>https://arxiv.org/abs/1405.5532</cite></blockquote>
 
<tabbox Researcher>

<note tip>
The motto in this section is: //the higher the level of abstraction, the better//.
</note>

--> Example1#

<--

--> Example2:#

<--

</tabbox>

Please solve the following equation to prove you're human. 176 +5 =  Please keep this field empty:

Edit summary

Note: By editing this page you agree to license your content under the following license: CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International

User Tools

Site Tools

Page Tools