Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
advanced_tools:bianchi_identities [2018/05/03 11:53] jakobadmin [Intuitive] |
advanced_tools:bianchi_identities [2019/01/16 14:35] (current) jakobadmin [Abstract] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
<tabbox Intuitive> | <tabbox Intuitive> | ||
- | Intuitively, Bianchi identities state that "the boundary of a boundary is zero". | + | Intuitively, Bianchi identities state that "//the boundary of a boundary is zero//". |
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | For example, let's consider a disk: O | ||
+ | |||
+ | The disk has a boundary, which is a circle. A circle has no boundary. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Next, let's consider a line segment: | | ||
+ | |||
+ | It is one-dimensional like the circle but has a boundary: the two endpoints. But then again, this boundary (=the two endpoints) don't have a boundary. | ||
| | ||
<tabbox Concrete> | <tabbox Concrete> | ||
+ | For an extremely illuminating discussion see | ||
+ | |||
+ | * [[https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF01882731|The Boundary of a Boundary Principle - a unified approach]] by Arkady Kheyfets. | ||
+ | |||
+ | In addition, good discussion can be found in | ||
+ | |||
* See chapter 15 in "Gravitation" by Misner Thorne and Wheeler and also | * See chapter 15 in "Gravitation" by Misner Thorne and Wheeler and also | ||
* page 253 in Gauge fields, knots, and gravity by J. Baez | * page 253 in Gauge fields, knots, and gravity by J. Baez | ||
- | + | ---- | |
- | <tabbox Abstract> | + | |
- | <note tip> | + | Bianchi identities express the fact that the boundary of a boundary is always zero. Mathematically this follows by applying Stoke's theorem twice. This is discussed explicitly in the book No-Nonsense Electrodynamics by Schwichtenberg |
- | The motto in this section is: //the higher the level of abstraction, the better//. | + | |
- | </note> | + | |
+ | |||
+ | <tabbox Abstract> | ||
+ | In general relativity, the Bianchi identity | ||
+ | $$ \nabla R = \nabla \nabla \theta =0 $$ | ||
+ | roughly says "that the sum over a closed two-dimensional surface of rotations induced by Riemannian curvature is equal to zero. [...] Geometrically this means that the density of the moment of rotation induced by Riemannian curvature is equal to zero automatically." ([[https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF01882731|Source]]) | ||
<tabbox Why is it interesting?> | <tabbox Why is it interesting?> | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> |