User Tools

Site Tools


advanced_notions:uncertainty_principle

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
advanced_notions:uncertainty_principle [2018/05/11 16:25]
jakobadmin [Intuitive]
advanced_notions:uncertainty_principle [2018/07/26 17:56] (current)
77.177.199.249 [FAQ]
Line 5: Line 5:
 We can generate a wave in a long rope by shaking it rhythmically up and down.  We can generate a wave in a long rope by shaking it rhythmically up and down. 
  
-Now, if someone asks us"Where precisely is the wave?" we wouldn'​t have a good answer since the wave is spread outIn contrast, if we get asked: "​What'​s the wavelength of the wave?" we could easily answer this question.+{{ :advanced_notions:​wave1rope.png?nolink&​600 |}}
  
-We can also generate a different kind of wave in a rope by jerking it only once. This way we get a narrow bump that travels down the line. Now, we could easily answer the question: "Where precisely is the wave?" but we would have a hard time answer the question "​What'​s the wavelength of the wave?" since the wave isn't periodic and it is completely unclear how we could assign a wavelength to it. +Now, if someone asks us: "Where precisely is the wave?" we wouldn'​t have a good answer since the wave is spread out. In contrast, if we get asked: "​What'​s the wavelength of the wave?" we could easily answer this question: "​It'​s around 6cm"​. 
 + 
 +We can also generate a different kind of wave in a rope by jerking it only once.  
 + 
 +{{ :​advanced_notions:​wave2rope.png?​nolink&​600 |}} 
 + 
 +This way we get a narrow bump that travels down the line. Now, we could easily answer the question: "Where precisely is the wave?" but we would have a hard time answer the question "​What'​s the wavelength of the wave?" since the wave isn't periodic and it is completely unclear how we could assign a wavelength to it. 
  
 Similarly, we can generate any type of wave between these two edge cases. However, there is always a tradeoff. The more precise the position of the wave is, the less precise its wavelength becomes and vice versa. ​ Similarly, we can generate any type of wave between these two edge cases. However, there is always a tradeoff. The more precise the position of the wave is, the less precise its wavelength becomes and vice versa. ​
Line 13: Line 19:
 This is true for any wave phenomena and since in quantum mechanics we describe particle using waves, it also applies here. In quantum mechanics, the wavelength is in a direct relationship to its momentum. The larger the momentum, the smaller the wavelength of the wave that describes the particle. A spread in wavelength, therefore, corresponds to a spread in momentum. As a result, we can derive an uncertainty relation that tells us: This is true for any wave phenomena and since in quantum mechanics we describe particle using waves, it also applies here. In quantum mechanics, the wavelength is in a direct relationship to its momentum. The larger the momentum, the smaller the wavelength of the wave that describes the particle. A spread in wavelength, therefore, corresponds to a spread in momentum. As a result, we can derive an uncertainty relation that tells us:
  
-The more precisely we determine the location of a particle, the less precisely we can determine its momentum and vice versa.+The more precisely we determine the location of a particle, the less precisely we can determine its momentum and vice versa. The thing is that a localized wave bump can be thought of as a superposition of dozens of other waves with well-defined wave-lengths((This is exactly the idea behind the [[basic_tools:​fourier_transform|Fourier transform]].)):​ 
 + 
 +{{ :​advanced_notions:​fourieruncertainty.png?​nolink&​600 |}} 
 +In this sense, such a localized bump does not have one specific wavelength but is a superposition of many.
  
 ---- ----
Line 24: Line 33:
 <​cite>​https://​www.scientificamerican.com/​article/​common-interpretation-of-heisenbergs-uncertainty-principle-is-proven-false/</​cite>​ <​cite>​https://​www.scientificamerican.com/​article/​common-interpretation-of-heisenbergs-uncertainty-principle-is-proven-false/</​cite>​
 </​blockquote>​ </​blockquote>​
 +
 +<​blockquote>​Bohr,​ for his part, explained uncertainty by pointing out that answering certain questions necessitates not answering others. To measure position, we need a stationary measuring object, like a fixed photographic plate. This plate defines a fixed frame of reference. To measure velocity, by contrast, we need an apparatus that allows for some recoil, and hence moveable parts. This experiment requires a movable frame. Testing one therefore means not testing the other. <​cite>​https://​opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/​2013/​07/​21/​nothing-to-see-here-demoting-the-uncertainty-principle/</​cite></​blockquote>​
  
 ---- ----
Line 58: Line 69:
 \begin{equation} ​ \sigma_A \sigma_B \geq \big | \frac{1}{2i} \langle [A,B] \rangle \big|^2 . \end{equation} \begin{equation} ​ \sigma_A \sigma_B \geq \big | \frac{1}{2i} \langle [A,B] \rangle \big|^2 . \end{equation}
  
 +See also
 +
 +  * [[https://​arxiv.org/​abs/​quant-ph/​0608138|The certainty principle (review)]] by D. A. Arbatsky
 ---- ----
  
Line 67: Line 81:
 that can be consistently attributed to it. Indeed, an observable (such that can be consistently attributed to it. Indeed, an observable (such
 as q) that is not invariant under the automorphisms of a state (such as q) that is not invariant under the automorphisms of a state (such
-as |jp) cannot define an “objective” property of the latter. Hence,+as |jp) cannot define an “objective” property of the latter. Hence,
 the expectation value function will have a non-zero dispersion. We the expectation value function will have a non-zero dispersion. We
 have argued that this dispersion measures the extent to which the have argued that this dispersion measures the extent to which the
Line 100: Line 114:
  
 In some sense, it completely encapsulates what is different about quantum mechanics compared to [[theories:​classical_mechanics|classical mechanics]]. ​ In some sense, it completely encapsulates what is different about quantum mechanics compared to [[theories:​classical_mechanics|classical mechanics]]. ​
 +
 +
 +<​blockquote>​
 +A philosopher once said ‘It is necessary for the very existence of science that the same conditions always produce the same results’. Well, they don’t!
 +
 +- Richard Feynman
 +</​blockquote>​
  
  
  
 <tabbox FAQ> ​ <tabbox FAQ> ​
 +
  
 --> Is there a time-energy uncertainty relation?# --> Is there a time-energy uncertainty relation?#
Line 150: Line 172:
 <-- <--
  
---->​What'​s the origin of the uncertainty?​ #+-->​What'​s the origin of the uncertainty?#​
  
 <​blockquote>​Quantum mechanics uses the generators of the corresponding symmetry as measurement operators. For instance, this has the consequence that a measurement of momentum is equivalent to the action of the translation generator. (Recall that invariance under translations leads us to conservation of momentum.) The translation generator moves our system a little bit and therefore the location is changed.<​cite>​Physics from Symmetry by J. Schwichtenberg</​cite></​blockquote>​ <​blockquote>​Quantum mechanics uses the generators of the corresponding symmetry as measurement operators. For instance, this has the consequence that a measurement of momentum is equivalent to the action of the translation generator. (Recall that invariance under translations leads us to conservation of momentum.) The translation generator moves our system a little bit and therefore the location is changed.<​cite>​Physics from Symmetry by J. Schwichtenberg</​cite></​blockquote>​
 <-- <--
- 
  
  
 </​tabbox>​ </​tabbox>​
  
-{{tag>​theories:​quantum_theory:​quantum_mechanics theories:​quantum_theory:​quantum_field_theory}} 
  
advanced_notions/uncertainty_principle.1526048746.txt.gz · Last modified: 2018/05/11 14:25 (external edit)