User Tools

Site Tools


advanced_notions:topological_defects

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Last revision Both sides next revision
advanced_notions:topological_defects [2017/12/20 11:08]
jakobadmin [Student]
advanced_notions:topological_defects [2017/12/20 11:10]
jakobadmin [Student]
Line 24: Line 24:
 <tabbox Layman> ​ <tabbox Layman> ​
  
-<note tip> + 
-Explanations in this section should contain no formulas, but instead colloquial things like you would hear them during a coffee break or at a cocktail party. +  * A great laymen introduction to topoltogical defects can be found at https://​skepticsplay.blogspot.de/2013/​02/​what-are-topological-defects.html 
-</note> +  ​* See also http://​web.mit.edu/​8.334/​www/​grades/​projects/​projects14/​TrungPhan_8334WP/​foundation-5.2.2/​index.html for some very nice illustration of topological defects
-  ​+
 <tabbox Student> ​ <tabbox Student> ​
  
Line 39: Line 38:
  
   * A great introduction is http://​www.dartmouth.edu/​~dbr/​topdefects.pdf and    * A great introduction is http://​www.dartmouth.edu/​~dbr/​topdefects.pdf and 
-  * see also http://​www.lassp.cornell.edu/​sethna/​pubPDF/​OrderParameters.pdf+  * see also http://​www.lassp.cornell.edu/​sethna/​pubPDF/​OrderParameters.pdf ​and 
 +  * [[https://​www.scribd.com/​document/​85012149/​From-Monopoles-to-Textures-A-Survey-of-Topological-Defects-in-Cosmological-Quantum-Field-Theory|From Monopoles to Textures]] by Damian Sowinski
  
  
Line 45: Line 45:
 <tabbox Researcher> ​ <tabbox Researcher> ​
  
-<note tip> +Topological defects are most easily understood by considering the scalar potential. A non-trivial vev breaks a given group $G$ to some subgroup $H$. Depending on the [[advanced_tools:​topology:​homotopy|homotopy class]] of the vacuum manifold $G/H$ (speak [[advanced_tools:​group_theory:​quotient_group|G mod H]]), we get different topological defects. 
-The motto in this section ​is: //the higher ​the level of abstraction, the better//. + 
-</note>+  * If the [[advanced_tools:​topology:​homotopy|homotopy class]] of $G/H$ is non-trivial this tells us that the vacuum manifold is not connected and thus there are **domain walls** between the different sectors. A domain wall is a **two-dimensional** object with non-zero field energy. An example, is a scalar potential with $Z_2$ symmetry that breaks to the trivial subgroup $1$. The vacuum manifold is $Z_2/1=Z_2$ and is therefore disconnected. For a surface, or domain wall, what we have said so far leads us to expect a map $S^0 \to M$ (for a d-dimensional singularity has led to a map $S^{2-d} \to M$). So, the unit sphere $S^0$ in R, consists of the two points $\pm 1$. One of the points, +1, corresponds to a point on one side of the domain wall and the other, -1, to a point on the other side."​ 
 +  * If the first homotopy class of $G/H$ is non-trivial,​ we get **one-dimensional** topological defects that are called **strings**. An example is when a scalar potential with $U(1)$ symmetry breaks to the trivial subgroup $1$. The vacuum manifold is $U(1)/​1=U(1) \simeq S^1$, which is connected, but not simply connected. This makes it possible that strings show up. (For an explanation with $S^1$ is not simply connected, see section 1.3.1 [[http://people.physics.tamu.edu/​pope/​geom-group.pdf|here]]) 
 +  * If the second homotopy class of $G/H$ is non-trivial,​ we get a **zero-dimensional** topological defect, a "a pointlike singularity"​ that is called a **[[advanced_notions:​topological_defects:​magnetic_monopoles|monopole]]**. ​ An example is when a scalar potential with $SU(2)$ symmetry breaks to $U(1)$. The vacuum manifold is $SU(2)/​U(1)\simeq S^2$. 
 +  * If the third homotopy class of $G/H$ is non-trivialwe get so called “**textures**”. In fact the notion "​textures"​ is more popular among condensed matter physicists and particle physicists call this kind of topological defect **Skyrmions**. ​ "If space is a three sphere, we can have a texture wrapped around the entire three sphere and this would give a static solution in the model."​ ([[https://arxiv.org/pdf/​hep-ph/​9710292.pdf|source]]). An example is when a scalar potential with $SU(2)$ symmetry breaks to the trivial subgroup $1$. The vacuum manifold is $SU(2)/1 =SU(2) \simeq S^3$. 
 + 
 +---- 
 + 
 +**Recommended Resources:​** 
  
   ​   ​
advanced_notions/topological_defects.txt · Last modified: 2017/12/20 11:11 by jakobadmin