User Tools

Site Tools


advanced_notions:thomas_precession

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Last revision Both sides next revision
advanced_notions:thomas_precession [2019/06/10 10:13]
jakobadmin [Abstract]
advanced_notions:thomas_precession [2019/06/10 10:19]
jakobadmin [Abstract]
Line 12: Line 12:
    
 <tabbox Abstract> ​ <tabbox Abstract> ​
 +Abstractly, the Thomas precession is due to an additional rotation the spin of the particle pics up as a result of of the orbit movement. In this sense, the phenomenon is due to a [[advanced_tools:​geometric_phase|geometric phase]]/​Berry phase.
 +
 +
 +From a group theoretic perspective,​ Thomas precession occurs because Lorentz boost do not commute. For example, we have 
 +$$[K_y,​\,​K_x] = i\,J_z \, .$$
 +  ​
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +---
  
 <​blockquote>​{{ :​advanced_notions:​thomas_precession.jpg?​nolink&​200|}}[T]he revolution of the particle around the nucleus can be interpreted as a sequence of Lorentz boosts.[...] Abstractly, the effect is due to Wigner rotations [3] that appear in representations of the Poincaré group, so it is purely kinematical—it follows solely from space-time symmetries. <​cite>​https://​arxiv.org/​abs/​1711.05753</​cite></​blockquote>​ <​blockquote>​{{ :​advanced_notions:​thomas_precession.jpg?​nolink&​200|}}[T]he revolution of the particle around the nucleus can be interpreted as a sequence of Lorentz boosts.[...] Abstractly, the effect is due to Wigner rotations [3] that appear in representations of the Poincaré group, so it is purely kinematical—it follows solely from space-time symmetries. <​cite>​https://​arxiv.org/​abs/​1711.05753</​cite></​blockquote>​
  
    
 +<​blockquote>​To get the Lorentz transformation mapping from frame 1 to 3 directly, we compose boosts:
 +
 +$$\exp\left(\frac{a_y}{c} \,\delta t\, K_y + \frac{a_x}{c} \,\delta t\, K_x\right) \exp\left(\frac{v_x}{c}\,​K_x\right) = \exp\left(\frac{v_x}{c}\,​K_x + \frac{a_x}{c}\,​\delta t\,K_x + \frac{a_y}{c}\,​\delta t\, K_y + \frac{a_y\,​v_x}{2\,​c^2}\,​[K_y,​\,​K_x]\,​\delta t + \cdots\right)\tag{1}$$ ​
  
 +by the Dynkin formula version of the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff theorem. From the commutation relationships for the Lorentz group we get $[K_y,​\,​K_x] = i\,J_z$, so that $\frac{a_y\,​v_x}{2\,​c^2}\,​[K_y,​\,​K_x]\,​\delta t$ corresponds to a rotation about the $z$ axis of $a_y\,​v_x\,​\delta t / (2\,c^2)$ radians (here, somewhat obviously $J_z,​\,​J_y,​\,​J_z$ are "​generators of rotations",​ *i.e.* tangents to rotations about the $x,\,y,\,z$ axes at the identity, respectively,​ whilst $J_z,​\,​J_y,​\,​J_z$ are "​generators"​ of boosts).<​cite>​https://​physics.stackexchange.com/​a/​99459/​37286</​cite></​blockquote>​
 <tabbox Why is it interesting?> ​   <tabbox Why is it interesting?> ​  
  
advanced_notions/thomas_precession.txt · Last modified: 2019/06/10 10:20 by jakobadmin