User Tools

Site Tools


advanced_notions:relational_physics

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
advanced_notions:relational_physics [2017/11/09 10:22]
jakobadmin [Student]
advanced_notions:relational_physics [2018/03/15 13:56] (current)
jakobadmin [Why is it interesting?]
Line 3: Line 3:
 <tabbox Why is it interesting?> ​ <tabbox Why is it interesting?> ​
  
-<​blockquote>'​There is no law except the law that there is no law... ​ Ultimate mutability is the central feature of physics.' ​ <​cite>​-John Wheeler</​cite></​blockquote>​+
  
 It is usually stated that the fundamental insight of general relativity is that there is no gravitational field at all. The gravitational force is rather an illusion due to the curvature of spacetime. ​ It is usually stated that the fundamental insight of general relativity is that there is no gravitational field at all. The gravitational force is rather an illusion due to the curvature of spacetime. ​
  
-However, we can also make a completely contrary argument, which is what Einstein realised after several decades. Instead of the statement above, we can take as the fundamental insight of general relativity that there is no spacetime, only the gravitational field! This line of thought is described nicely in the book "​[[http://​www.cpt.univ-mrs.fr/​~rovelli/​book.pdf|Quantum Gravity]]"​ by Rovelli and is based on the "hole argument"​. ​+However, we can also make a completely contrary argument, which is what Einstein realised after several decades. Instead of the statement above, we can take as the fundamental insight of general relativity that there is no spacetime, only the gravitational field! This line of thought is described nicely in the book "​[[http://​www.cpt.univ-mrs.fr/​~rovelli/​book.pdf|Quantum Gravity]]"​ by Rovelli and is based on the "hole argument"​. ​Se also [[http://​jakobschwichtenberg.com/​the-true-magic-hidden-inside-general-relativity/​|this essay]].  ​
  
 Similar statements can be made for other theories, like gauge theories. This is discussed, for example, in the section "​Towards a Pointless Theory"​ in the book "Some elementary gauge theory concepts"​. ​ Similar statements can be made for other theories, like gauge theories. This is discussed, for example, in the section "​Towards a Pointless Theory"​ in the book "Some elementary gauge theory concepts"​. ​
Line 15: Line 15:
 The basic idea is that the only thing that matters are the points where worldlines of different objects meets. Everything else is not observable and hence has no meaning. In this sense there is no spacetime and no "inner spaces"​. The only things that matter are relative relations between objects. Everything else can not be observed, because an observation necessarily implies that objects meet.  The basic idea is that the only thing that matters are the points where worldlines of different objects meets. Everything else is not observable and hence has no meaning. In this sense there is no spacetime and no "inner spaces"​. The only things that matter are relative relations between objects. Everything else can not be observed, because an observation necessarily implies that objects meet. 
  
 +----
  
 +<​blockquote>'​There is no law except the law that there is no law... ​ Ultimate mutability is the central feature of physics.' ​ <​cite>​-John Wheeler</​cite></​blockquote>​
  
 <​blockquote>​The requirement of general covariance “takes away from space and time the last remnant of physical reality <​cite>​Einstein</​cite></​blockquote>​ <​blockquote>​The requirement of general covariance “takes away from space and time the last remnant of physical reality <​cite>​Einstein</​cite></​blockquote>​
Line 27: Line 29:
  
 <​cite>​https://​en.wikipedia.org/​wiki/​Hole_argument</​cite></​blockquote>​ <​cite>​https://​en.wikipedia.org/​wiki/​Hole_argument</​cite></​blockquote>​
 +
 +<​blockquote>​Traveler,​ there are no paths;
 +Paths are made by walking.
 +<​cite>​Antonio Machado</​cite>​
 +</​blockquote>​
  
 <tabbox Layman> ​ <tabbox Layman> ​
Line 48: Line 55:
 the problem is to organize them, to give them a structure. From the physical point the problem is to organize them, to give them a structure. From the physical point
 of view, one postulates with Newton the existence of an absolute space, in which of view, one postulates with Newton the existence of an absolute space, in which
- 
 the phenomena occur: positions are predetermined,​ destined to be inhabited by the the phenomena occur: positions are predetermined,​ destined to be inhabited by the
 accidents of matter. accidents of matter.
Line 65: Line 71:
  
 Probably the right mathematical tool to make the ideas of relational physics precise is [[advanced_tools:​category_theory|category theory]]. ​ Probably the right mathematical tool to make the ideas of relational physics precise is [[advanced_tools:​category_theory|category theory]]. ​
 +
 +----
 +
 +  * A great recent summary of the relational interpretation of quantum mechanics is "​[[https://​arxiv.org/​abs/​1712.02894|Space is blue and birds fly through it]]" Carlo Rovelli
 <tabbox Researcher> ​ <tabbox Researcher> ​
  
Line 78: Line 88:
   * N. D. Mermin, “What is quantum mechanics trying to tell us?,” Am. J. Phys. 66 (9), 753-767 (1998).   * N. D. Mermin, “What is quantum mechanics trying to tell us?,” Am. J. Phys. 66 (9), 753-767 (1998).
  
---> Common Question 1# 
- 
-  
-<-- 
- 
---> Common Question 2# 
  
-  
-<-- 
   ​   ​
 <tabbox Examples> ​ <tabbox Examples> ​
advanced_notions/relational_physics.1510219330.txt.gz · Last modified: 2017/12/04 08:01 (external edit)