Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- advanced_notions:quantum_field_theory:instantons [2018/03/17 15:39]
jakobadmin [Student]
+++ advanced_notions:quantum_field_theory:instantons [2021/10/01 11:46] (current)
79.35.127.248 the text emphasis wasn't formatting correctly
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ====== Instantons ======
-<tabbox Why is it interesting?>
-<blockquote>
+<tabbox Intuitive>
-The vacuum which we inhabit is filled with such instantons at a density of the order of one instanton
-per femtometer in every direction. (The precise quantitative theoretical predictions of this [ScSh98] suffer
-from an infrared regularization ambiguity, but numerical simulations demonstrate the phenomenon [Gru13].)
-This “instanton sea” that fills spacetime governs the mass of the η′-particle [Wit79, Ven79] as well as
-other non-perturbative chromodynamical phenomena, such as the quark-gluon plasma seen in experiment
-[Shu01]. It is also at the heart of the standard hypothesis for the mechanism of primordial baryogenesis
-[Sak67, ’tHo76, RiTr99], the fundamental explanation of a universe filled with matter.<cite>https://arxiv.org/abs/1601.05956</cite></blockquote>
-<blockquote>
+In quantum mechanics, potential barriers are no longer as tough as they are in classical mechanics. Instead, any physical system can tunnel through a potential barrier with some probability.
-Of all the solutions, the instantons have interested mathematicians most; for physicists they give a semi-classical understanding of some of the [[advanced_tools:topology|topological]] effects that are present in Yang-Mills theory.
-<cite>Topological Investigations of Quantized Gauge Theories, by R. Jackiw (1983)</cite>
+Instantons are sequences of field configurations that describe how a field tunnels through a potential barrier.
-</blockquote>
+Such potential barriers exist, for example, when there is not only one state with minimum energy but many. Between these possible ground states, we usually have a potential barrier. However, in a quantum theory the field can transform itself from one ground state configuration into another ground state configuration and such a process is called an instanton.
-<tabbox Layman>
+<tabbox Concrete>
+In contrast to other solitons like, for example, [[advanced_notions:topological_defects:magnetic_monopoles|monopoles]], instantons can not be interpreted as "particle-like". Instead instantons is a continuous set of field configurations that describe how the field tunnels from one vacuum configuration into another. Nevertheless, we call instantons also topological solitons, because they describe field configurations with finite (Euclidean) energy.
-<note tip>
+Such processes cannot be described by [[advanced_notions:quantum_field_theory:perturbation_theory|perturbation theory]], but instead only with the help of [[advanced_tools:non-perturbative_qft|non-perturbative methods]]. This follows since the wave function of tunnel processes is proportional to $e^{1/x}$ or $e^{1/x^2}$ and the Taylor expansion of such functions vanishes. Hence such effects do not appear in a perturbative expansion also, of course, these effects exist.
-Explanations in this section should contain no formulas, but instead colloquial things like you would hear them during a coffee break or at a cocktail party.
-</note>
+The [[advanced_notions:quantum_field_theory:qcd_vacuum|ground state]] of, for example, [[models:standard_model:qcd|QCD]] consists of an infinite number of degenerate states that are separated by a finite energy barrier. An instanton is a description how the field tunnels (not meant in a spatial sense) through one of these barriers into another vacuum. During the tunnel process the field, also in the ground state at the beginning and end of the process, goes continuously through a set of field configurations that do not correspond to a ground state, i.e. non-zero field energy. This is meant when we say that an instanton "has" finite field energy.
-<tabbox Student>
-In contrast to other solitons like, for example, [[advanced_notions:topological_defects:magnetic_monopoles|monopoles]], instantons can not be interpreted as particles. Instead instantons is a continuous set of field configurations that describe how the field tunnels from one vacuum configuration into another. Nevertheless, we call instantons also topological solitons, because they describe field configurations with finite (Euclidean) energy.
-The ground state of, for example, QCD consists of an infinite number of degenerate states that are separated by a finite energy barrier. An instanton is a description how the field tunnels (not meant in a spatial sense) through one of these barriers into another vacuum. During the tunnel process the field, also in the ground state at the beginning and end of the process, goes continuously through a set of field configurations that do not correspond to a ground state, i.e. non-zero field energy. This is meant when we say that an instanton "has" finite field energy.
+A detailed discussion of instantons written with the needs of students in mind can be found [[http://jakobschwichtenberg.com/demystifying-the-qcd-vacuum-part-1/|here]].
-Instantons occur in pure Yang-Mills theory with a non-abelian gauge group, for example, $SU(2)$. In contrast to Dirac monopoles and 't Hooft-Polyakov monopoles, Instantons do care about time. That's where their name comes from: they are localized in space and time. Therefore, this time we must consider their behavior in space and time. For reasons explained here (LINK), we describe tunnel processes in Euclidean spacetime, instead of Minkowski spacetime. Thus, for instantons, we investigate their behavior in $\mathbb{R}^4$.
+Instantons occur in pure Yang-Mills theory with a non-abelian gauge group, for example, $SU(2)$. In contrast to Dirac monopoles and 't Hooft-Polyakov monopoles, Instantons do care about time. That's where their name comes from: they are localized in space and time. Therefore, this time we must consider their behavior in space and time. For reasons explained [[advanced_tools:non-perturbative_qft|here]], we describe tunnel processes in Euclidean spacetime, instead of Minkowski spacetime. Thus, for instantons, we investigate their behavior in $\mathbb{R}^4$.
-Again, our demand for a finite field energy is translated mathematically into a description on $S^4$ instead of $\mathbb{R}^4$, because $\mathbb{R}^4 \cup \{ \infty \} \simeq S^4$.
+Our demand for a finite field energy is translated mathematically into a description on $S^4$ instead of $\mathbb{R}^4$, because $\mathbb{R}^4 \cup \{ \infty \} \simeq S^4$.
 As for the monopoles, the presence of an instanton makes itself felt through the fact that we must consider two patches for the gauge potential and need a transition function in the overlap region. This time the minimal overlap region, the higher-dimensional "equator" of $S^4$, is $S^3$. As for the Dirac monopole, where we also considered a pure gauge theory, our transition function is a map from the overlap region $S^3$ to the gauge group $SU(2)$. $SU(2)$ as a manifold is $S^3$ and thus our transition function is a map $S^3 \to S^3$.
 The topological conclusion will be that instantons are characterized by the third homotopy class of $SU(2) \simeq S^3$, which is again simply $\mathbb{Z}$, the set of integers.
+----
+Minimas of the "Yang-Mills energy" correspond to pure gauge configurations. A pure gauge configuration of a field is a field configuration that can be written as a gauge transformation of $A_\mu=0$:
+\begin{equation}
+G_{\mu}^{\left(  pg\right)  }=\frac{\pi}{g}U\partial_{\mu}U^{\dagger}
+\end{equation}
+An example is the famous BPST instanton ([[https://books.google.de/books?id=rbcQMK6a6ekC&lpg=PA129&ots=kb7yWQczYE&dq=%22pure%20gauge%22%20zero%20field%20strength%20vacuum%20not%20gauge%20invariant&hl=de&pg=PA134#v=onepage&q&f=false|source]]):
+$$ G_\mu(x) = \frac{2}{g} \frac{\eta_{\mu\nu} x_\nu}{x^2+\rho^2} ,$$
+where $\rho$ is an arbitrary parameter that characterizes the size of the instanton.
+Equally, one can derive the distribution of field strength, for example, for an anti-instanton:
+$$ G_{\mu\nu}(x) =  \frac{\eta_{\mu\nu}192 \rho^4 }{(x^2+\rho^2)^4} .$$
+Thus, we can see that the field strength is localized in space.
@@ Line 57: / Line 69: @@
   * Aspects of Symmetry by S. Coleman
   * and ABC of Instantons by M. Shifman et al.
-<tabbox Researcher>
-  * See section 6.3 in Topology, Geometry and Gauge Fields: Foundations by Naber for a quick overview
-  * Freed, D.S., and K.K. Uhlenbeck, Instantons and Four-Manifolds, MSRI Publications, Springer-Verlag, New York, Berlin, 1984
+<tabbox Abstract>
-  * Lawson, H.B., The Theory of Gauge Fields in Four Dimensions, Regional Conference Series in Mathematics # 58, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1985
+One way to write the instanton potential is
+$$ A_1 = \frac{r}{r^2+c^2}\gamma^{-1}d\gamma , $$
+where
+$$ \gamma = \frac{1}{r}\left( x_0 + i \sum_i \sigma_i x_i \right),$$
+where $\sigma_i$ are the Pauli matrices.
+This potential is regular at $x=0$, but decays only as $r^{-1}$ for $r \to \infty$.
+We can perform a gauge transformation of $A_1$ to get
+$$ A_2 = \gamma A_1 \gamma^{-1} +\gamma d\gamma= \frac{c^2}{r^2+c^2}\gamma d\gamma^{-1} . $$
+Now, $A_2$ is singular at $x=0$, but decays sufficiently fast (like $r^{-3}$) as $r \to \infty$.
+In this sense, we can not get a global description of the instanton potential, but instead must use the two local descriptions $A_1$ and $A_2$ that are valid in different domain. $A_1$ is valid on $S^4 - \{ \text{south pole} \}=U_1$ and it is the slow decay as $r \to \infty$ that prevents us from using $A_1$ everywhere. Analogously, we can use $A_2$ on $S^4 - \{ \text{north pole} \} =U_2$, because $A_2$ decays sufficiently fast, but is singular at $x=0$.
+In the overlap region $U_1 \cup U_2$ the two descriptions $A_1$ and $A_2$ are related by a gauge transformation.
+$A_1$ and $A_2$ are local descriptions of a connection on an $SU(2)$ principal bundle over $S^4$ whose transition function is $\gamma$. The total space of the bundle is $S^7$ and thus, we can say that an instanton is described by the [[advanced_tools:hopf_bundle|Hopf map]]
+$$ S^7 \to S^4 . $$
+----
 <blockquote>The physics of isotopic spin led Yang and Mills to propose certain differ-
@@ Line 79: / Line 114: @@
 Lorentz force that the electromagnetic field exerts on the electron.
 But this data is insufficient for passing to the quantum theory of the electron: locally, on a coordinate chart $U$,
-what the quantum electron really couples to is the ``\emph{vector potential}'', a differential 1-form
+what the quantum electron really couples to is the vector potential, a differential 1-form
 $A_U$ on $U$, such that $d A_U = F|_U$. But globally such a vector potential may not exist.
 Dirac realized that what it takes to define the quantized electron globally is,
@@ Line 115: / Line 150: @@
 <cite>https://arxiv.org/abs/1601.05956</cite></blockquote>
-<tabbox Examples>
---> Example1#
+----
+  * See section 6.3 in Topology, Geometry and Gauge Fields: Foundations by Naber for a quick overview
-<--
+  * Freed, D.S., and K.K. Uhlenbeck, Instantons and Four-Manifolds, MSRI Publications, Springer-Verlag, New York, Berlin, 1984
+  * Lawson, H.B., The Theory of Gauge Fields in Four Dimensions, Regional Conference Series in Mathematics # 58, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1985
---> Example2:#
+<tabbox Why is it interesting?>
-<--
-<tabbox FAQ>
+<blockquote>
-<tabbox History>
+The vacuum which we inhabit is filled with such instantons at a density of the order of one instanton
+per femtometer in every direction. (The precise quantitative theoretical predictions of this [ScSh98] suffer
+from an infrared regularization ambiguity, but numerical simulations demonstrate the phenomenon [Gru13].)
+This “instanton sea” that fills spacetime governs the mass of the η′-particle [Wit79, Ven79] as well as
+other non-perturbative chromodynamical phenomena, such as the quark-gluon plasma seen in experiment
+[Shu01]. It is also at the heart of the standard hypothesis for the mechanism of primordial baryogenesis
+[Sak67, ’tHo76, RiTr99], the fundamental explanation of a universe filled with matter.<cite>https://arxiv.org/abs/1601.05956</cite></blockquote>
+<blockquote>
+Of all the solutions, the instantons have interested mathematicians most; for physicists they give a semi-classical understanding of some of the [[advanced_tools:topology|topological]] effects that are present in Yang-Mills theory.
+<cite>Topological Investigations of Quantized Gauge Theories, by R. Jackiw (1983)</cite>
+</blockquote>
+<tabbox FAQ>
+--> How do instantons cause vacuum decay?#
+see https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/127879/how-do-instantons-cause-vacuum-decay
+<--
 </tabbox>

User Tools

Site Tools

Differences

Page Tools