✎ Anomalies [The Physics Travel Guide]

You've loaded an old revision of the document! If you save it, you will create a new version with this data.

====== Anomalies ======

<tabbox Intuitive> 
{{ :advanced_notions:quantum_field_theory:diracsea.png?400|}}

To understand anomalies consider the ground state of fermions. One useful way to imagine the ground state of fermions is as a Dirac sea, as shown on the right-hand side.

In the ground state configuration all negative energy states are filled and no positive energy states are filled, i.e. no electrons or positrons exist. A positron would be a hole in the filled up Dirac sea of negative energy states.

Now, the anomaly comes about when we consider what happens when we investigate what happens to this ground state as soon as the fermions start interacting with a gauge field.

[{{ :advanced_notions:quantum_field_theory:diracseaanomaly.png?600 |Source: Effects of Dirac's Negative Energy Sea on Quantum Numbers by R. Jackiw}}]

As a result of the presence of the gauge field the energy levels shift. Some states get lifted up from the Dirac sea and become positive energy states. Other empty states with former positive energy become now negative energy states and thus holes get pushed down the Dirac sea.

The ground state then is no longer empty. Instead, we have electrons and positrons (=holes in the Dirac sea). This is what we call an anomaly.

A bit more precise, the anomaly is that we would expect that a quantity is conserved, but upon closer inspection we find that it isn't. Instead we can observe the production of the quantity.

-----

<blockquote>”we must assign physical reality to Dirac’s negative energy sea,because it produces the chiral anomaly, whose effects areexperimentally observed, principally in the decay of the neutral pionto two photons, but there are other physical consequences as well.”<cite>[[https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-th/9903255.pdf|R. Jackiw]]</cite></blockquote>

-----

* For more on this intuitive perspective of anomalies, see [[https://arxiv.org/abs/1010.0943|Axial anomaly, Dirac sea, and the chiral magnetic effect]] by Dmitri E. Kharzeev

<tabbox Concrete> 
An anomaly is an obstruction to the construction of a quantum theory that has the same symmetry group as its action.

For example, the standard method to construct quantum theories ensures that if there is a symmetry group of the system, the Hilbert space should also be a representation of this group.

However, through the renormalization techniques extra $U(1)$ phases are introduced that ruin the standard argument that the Hilbert space is a representation of the system's symmetry group.

----

Given a [[formalisms:lagrangian_formalism|Lagrangian]] or a [[formalisms:hamiltonian_formalism|Hamiltonian]] we can search for symmetries of the action and then use [[theorems:noethers_theorems|Noether's theorem]] to calculate the conserved charges.

Each charge corresponds $Q_a$ to one [[advanced_tools:group_theory|generator]] $G_a$ of the [[basic_tools:symmetry|symmetry]] of the action. These Noether charges represent the generators on our Hilbert space in a quantum theory or on our phase space in a classical theory.

We can then use the charges and put them into the corresponding Lie bracket. In the classical theory, this is the [[advanced_notions:poisson_bracket|Poisson bracket]], in a [[theories:quantum_mechanics:canonical|quantum theory]] the [[formulas:canonical_commutation_relations|commutator]].

In most cases the Noether charges form a closed algebraic structure which is exactly the same as the algebra of the symmetry of the action.

$$ [Q_a,Q_b] = f_{ab}^c G_c = [G_a,G_b]   $$

However, for some systems this is not the case. Instead of the original symmetry algebra the Noether charges contains an additional term on the right-hand side.

$$ [Q_a,Q_b] = f_{ab}^c G_c  + X_c \neq  [G_a,G_b]  $$

Therefore, the Noether charges in such systems generate a different symmetry. We say they form a centrally extended version of the original algebra. The additional term $X_c$ on the right-hand side is known as the Schwinger term.

Take note that people usually talk anomalies only in a quantum context and anomalies are described as quantum mechanical symmetry breaking. However it can also happen in a classical system that we can't realize our symmetry on the phase space and hence classical anomalies also exist.

----

**Non-conserved currents**

An important implications of the situation discussed above is that currents where we would think they are conserved since they correspond to symmetries via Noether's theorem, are not really conserved. A famous example is the axial current $J_A$ in the [[models:standard_model|standard model]].

Purely by looking at the Lagrangian we would believe

$$ \partial_\mu J_A^\mu = 0, $$
thanks to Noether's theorem.

However, upon closer inspection (e.g. by calculation the famous Adler-Bell-Jackiw triangle diagram), we find that in the full quantum theory, we get instead

$$ \partial_\mu J_A^\mu = \frac{g^2C}{16\pi^2} G^{\mu \nu a} \tilde{G}_{\mu \nu }^a$ , $$

where $G^{\mu \nu a}$ is the field-strength tensor and $\tilde{G}_{\mu \nu }^a$ its dual.

Therefore, we find that axial rotations are not really symmetries of the Lagrangian. As a consequence, whenever we perform a axial rotation our Lagrangian changes by

$$ L \to L + \Delta L = L + \partial_\mu J_A^\mu . $$

This is important since we always need an axial rotation to diagonalize the quark mass matrices and this is an important part of the [[open_problems:strong_cp_puzzle|strong CP puzzle]].

----

<blockquote>
The anomaly phenomenon is sometimes called quantum mechanical symmetry breaking, since the theory naively appears to have a certain symmetry, but the Hilbert space is not quite a representation of this symmetry, due to the subtleties of how quantum field theories are defined.

<cite>Not Even Wrong by P. Woit</cite>
</blockquote>

<blockquote>
More generally, the anomaly refers to a subtlety in quantization: a symmetry of the classical theory does not work in the expected way in the quantum theory. You already see this in the phenomenon of the one-half energy of the ground state in the harmonic oscillator. You can get rid of this by redefining the Hamiltonian, but that changes how the symmetries of the classical system are implemented in the quantum system. For a finite number of degrees of freedom, you can work with either Hamiltonian, but in QFT, with an infinite number of degrees of freedom, you don’t have a finite shift and this causes the anomaly.

<cite>http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=7847</cite>
</blockquote>

There are different kinds of anomalies:

-->Gauge Anomalies#

<blockquote>
In addition to the anomaly we have been discussing,
which affects the global symmetries studied in current algebra, there can also be an anomaly in the gauge symmetry of a theory. This is
called a gauge anomaly. Gauge anomalies are less well understood,
but definitely interfere with the standard methods for dealing with
the gauge symmetry of Yang-Mills quantum field theory. If one
throws out the quarks and considers the standard model with just
the leptons, one finds that this theory has a gauge anomaly, and it
ruins the standard renormalisation of the quantum field theory as
first performed by 't Hooft and Veltman. To this day it is unknown
whether or not there is some way around this problem, but it can be
avoided since if one puts the quarks back in the theory, one gets an
equal and opposite gauge anomaly that cancels the one coming from
the leptons. The full standard model has no gauge anomaly due to
this cancellation, and the principle that gauge anomalies should
cancel is often insisted upon when considering any extension of the
standard model.

<cite>Not Even Wrong by P. Woit</cite>
</blockquote>

<blockquote>
The existence of anomalies associated with global currents does not necessarily mean
difficulties for the theory. On the contrary, as we saw in the case of the axial anomaly,
its existence provides a solution of the Sutherland–Veltman paradox and an explanation of the electromagnetic decay of the pion. The situation is very different when
we deal with local symmetries. A quantum mechanical violation of gauge symmetry
leads to many problems, from lack of renormalizability to nondecoupling of negative norm states. This is because the presence of an anomaly in the theory implies
that the [[formulas:gauss_law|Gauss’ law]] constraint $D · E_A = ρ A$ cannot be consistently implemented
in the quantum theory. As a consequence, states that classically were eliminated by
the gauge symmetry become propagating in the quantum theory, thus spoiling the
consistency of the theory.

<cite>page 189 in Invitation to Quantum Field Theory by Alvarez-Gaume et. al.</cite>
</blockquote>

<blockquote>
In quantum field theories it is believed that anomalies in gauge symmetries (in contrast to rigid symmetries) cannot be coped with and must be canceled at the level of the elementary fields.

May be the earliest work on the subject is: C. Bouchiat, J. Iliopoulos and P. Meyer, “An Anomaly free Version of Weinberg’s Model” Phys. Lett. B38, 519 (1972). But certainly, one of the most famous ones is the Gross-Jakiw article: Effect of Anomalies on Quasi-Renormalizable Theories Phys. Rev. D 6, 477–493 (1972)

They argued that the 'tHooft-Veltman perturbative proof of the renormalizability of gauge theories requires the anomalous currents not to be coupled to gauge fields. In the more modern BRST quantization language, gauge anomalies give rise to anomalous terms in the Slavnov-taylor identities which cannot be canceled by local counter-terms therefore ruin the combinatorial proof of perturbative renormalizability and of the decoupling of the gauge components and ghosts which results a non-unitary S-matrix.

<cite>https://physics.stackexchange.com/a/34022/37286</cite>
</blockquote>

<blockquote>
Why is anomaly cancellation required for consistency? Two reasons are often
cited. The first reason is that anomalies cause a loss of unitarity or Lorentz
invariance. The point is that the gauge anomaly is a breakdown of gauge invariance at the quantum level. But we need gauge invariance to establish the equivalence of
the covariant gauge and physical gauge formulations of a gauge theory, and thus
to assure that the theory can be so formulated as to satisfy both unitarity and
Lorentz invariance simultaneously [2]. The second reason is that anomalies cause
a loss of renormalizability. The gauge anomaly causes the divergence structure of
the theory, softened by gauge invariance, to become more severe, so that an infinite
number of counterterms are generated.

<cite>http://www.theory.caltech.edu/~preskill/pubs/preskill-1991-anomalies.pdf</cite>
</blockquote>
<--
-->The Chiral Anomaly#

The chiral anomaly can be understood in a perfectly in a pictorial way, by invoking the Dirac see picture.

See for example, this [[http://www.iop.vast.ac.vn/theor/conferences/vsop/18/files/QFT-9.pdf|chapter]]. The best explanation of this idea can be found in chapter 9 of An Invitation to Quantum Field Theory Autoren by Alvarez-Gauméand Vázquez-Mozo; and also in [[http://inspirehep.net/record/314479|Intuitive understanding of anomalies: A Paradox with regularization]] by Holger Bech Nielsen and Masao Ninomiya.

See also, for example, [[https://books.google.co.il/books?hl=en&lr=&id=BhJfxOv6Y-YC&oi=fnd&pg=PA74&dq=%5CAnomalies,+as+a+manifestation+of+the+high+momentum+collective&ots=S3Ku25NYws&sig=Ot6mSvbDXkrel_uKZb37aTn-bQ0&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false|here]] or [[https://arxiv.org/pdf/1010.0943.pdf|here]] or [[https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9903255|Effects of Dirac's Negative Energy Sea on Quantum Numbers by R. Jackiw]] and also in section 4.5 in the book "Anomalies in Quantum Field Theory" by Bertlmann and the many references there.

This idea and the fact that this effect can [[https://www.nature.com/nphys/journal/v12/n6/full/nphys3648.html|actually be observed in solid state physics]], leads, for example, Roman Jackiw to the conclusion:

<blockquote>
It can then be shown that in the presence of a gauge field, the distinction between 'empty' positive-energy states and 'filled' negative-energy states cannot be drawn in a gauge-invariant manner, for massless, single-helicity fermions. Within this frame- work, the chiral anomaly comes from the gauge non-invariance of the infinite negative-energy sea. **Since anomalies have physical consequences, we must assign physical reality to this infinite negative-energy sea.** [5]

<cite>The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Quantum Field Theory by Roman Jackiw</cite>
</blockquote>

The central result of all chiral anomaly analyses are:

\begin{align}
\text{Classical Physics: }& \partial_\mu J_5^\mu =0 \notag \\
\text{Quantum Physics: }& \partial_\mu J_5^\mu =\frac{e^2}{(4\pi)^2}\epsilon^{\mu\nu\lambda\sigma} F_{\mu\nu}F_{\lambda \sigma} \notag \\
\end{align}

This means, the divergence of the axial current $J_5^\mu$ is non-zero through quantum effects, but is instead an operator that can produce two photons.
<--
-->The non-perturbative Anomaly#

<blockquote>
In all our discussion of anomalies we only considered the computation of one-
loop diagrams. It might happen that higher loop orders impose additional conditions. Fortunately this is not so: the Adler–Bardeen theorem [[https://journals.aps.org/pr/abstract/10.1103/PhysRev.182.1517|[12]]] guarantees that the
axial anomaly only receives contributions from one loop diagrams. Therefore, once
anomalies are canceled (if possible) at one loop we know that there will be no new
conditions coming from higher-loop diagrams in perturbation theory.
The Adler–Bardeen theorem, however, only applies in perturbation theory. It is
nonetheless possible that nonperturbative effects can result in the quantum violation
of a gauge symmetry. This is precisely the case pointed out by Witten [[https://inspirehep.net/record/181968/|[13]]] with
respect to the SU(2) gauge symmetry of the standard model. In this case the problem
lies in the nontrivial topology of the gauge group SU(2). The invariance of the theory
with respect to non-trivial gauge transformations requires the number of fermion
doublets to be even. It is again remarkable that the family structure of the standard
model makes this anomaly cancel

<cite>page 192 in "An Invitation to Quantum Field Theory" by Luis Álvarez-Gaumé et. al.</cite>
</blockquote>
<--
----

* For a nice introduction, see http://www.maths.dur.ac.uk/~dma0saa/lecture_notes.pdf
  * see also the discussion in https://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/QM/qmbook.pdf and [[https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/33195/classical-and-quantum-anomalies|here]]
  * and section 9.2. " Creation of particles by classical fields"  [[https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-th/0510040.pdf|here]]

----
 
<blockquote>
There is perhaps a dominant perception that quantum anomalies of classical
symmetries can occur only in the context of quantum field theories. Typically
they arise in the course of regularizing divergent expressions in quantum
fields [1, 2], causing the impression that it is these divergences that cause
anomalies.
It is however known that anomalies can occur in simple quantum mechanical
systems such as a particle on a circle or a rigid rotor. Esteve [4, 5]
explained long ago that the presence or otherwise of anomalies is a problem
of domains of quantum operators. Thus while quantum state vectors span a
Hilbert space H, the Hamiltonian H is seldom defined on all vectors of H.
For example, the space H of square-integrable functions on R
3
contains nondifferentiable
functions ψ, but the Schroedinger Hamiltonian H = −
1
2m ∇2
is
not defined on such ψ. Rather H is defined only on a dense subspace DH
of H. If a classical symmetry g does not preserve DH, gDH 6= DH, then
Hg ψ for ψ ∈ DH is an ill-defined expression. In this case, one says that g is
anomalous [4, 5]. See also [6–12].

In the present work, we explore the possibility of overcoming anomalies
by using mixed states. There are excellent reasons for trying to do so, there
being classical gauge symmetries like SU(3) of QCD or large diffeomorphisms
(diffeos) of manifolds (see below) which can become anomalous. Color SU(3) does so in the presence of non-abelian monopoles [13–15], while “large” diffeos
do so for suitable Friedman-Sorkin geon manifolds [16–18]. It is surely
worthwhile to find ways to properly implement these symmetries.

[...]

While non-abelian structure groups of twisted bundles are always anomalous,
abelian groups also of course can be anomalous. For instance, parity
anomaly for a particle on a circle (discussed in section 2 of this work) and the
axial U(1)A anomaly in the Standard Model are both abelian. **The crucial
issue is whether the classical symmetry preserves the domains of appropriate
operators like the Hamiltonian. If they do not preserve such domains, then
they are anomalous. The important feature of non-abelian structure groups
of twisted bundles is that they never preserve the domain of the Hamiltonian.
**
<cite>https://arxiv.org/pdf/1108.3898.pdf</cite></blockquote>

<blockquote>"In field theory and in modern elementary particle theory, [[advanced_tools:cocycles|cocycles]]
are used to describe anomalies."<cite>[[https://inspirehep.net/record/213998/files/v15-n3-p99.pdf|Source]]</cite></blockquote>

<blockquote>When chiral fermions are coupled to gauge fields, the algebra of gauge transformations acquires a Mickelsson-Faddeev (MF) cocycle (eq. 22) - a gauge anomaly. Mickelsson, together with Rajeev and maybe others, originally tried to construct representations of the this algebra. However, it was shown in

D. Pickrell, On the Mickelsson-Faddeev extensions and unitary representations, Comm. Math. Phys. 123 (1989) 617.

that the MF algebra does not possess any faithful unitary representation on a separable Hilbert space (or something like that). As a response to this disappointing result, Mickelsson developed a theory where cocycles depending on an external gauge potential are regarded as generalized representations. It is this theory which evidently is naturally formulated in terms of [[advanced_tools:gerbes]].<cite>[[https://golem.ph.utexas.edu/string/archives/000766.html|Thomas Larsson]]</cite></blockquote>

<blockquote>
Recently it has become clear that gauge theories with fermion display three different kinds of anomalies, all related to the global topology of the fourdimensional configuration space $C^ 4$ by the family index of the Dirac operator $D^4$ . These are the axial U(l) anomaly [the "$\pi_0(G^3)$ anomaly"], Witten's SU(2) anomaly [2] [from "$\pi_1(G^3)$" ] , and the nonabelian gauge anomaly [3] [from "$\pi_2(G^3)$"]. The diversity of the manifestations of these anomalies seems to belie their common origin, however. In the first case we find particle production in the presence of instanton fields [4], breaking of a global symmetry, and no problem with gauge invariance. In the second we find no problem with chiral charge, but instead a nonperturbative failure of gauge symmetry, while in the latter the same thing occurs even perturbatively. What is going on?

<cite>[[https://projecteuclid.org/download/pdf_1/euclid.cmp/1103942612|Hamiltonian Interpretation of Anomalies]] by Philip Nelson and Luis Alvarez-Gaume</cite>
</blockquote>

<blockquote>
Anomalies have
been first discovered in perturbation theory by UV–regularizing a divergent
diagram [1,2]. But they are not just a regularization effect, they also show
up in quite different procedures. For example, in the method of dispersion
relations where they occur as an IR–singularity of the transition amplitude [7,8],
or within sum rules [9]. Using a quite different approach, working with path
integrals, the anomalies are detected by the chiral transformation of the path
integral measure [10]. In the last years a development in modern mathematical
techniques attracted much attention in describing the anomalies. This was
differential geometry [11–17], cohomology [18,19]and topology (Atiyah–Singer
index theorem) [20–29].

<cite>https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-ph/9411254v1.pdf</cite>
</blockquote>

<blockquote>
**Nowadays there exists a more fundamental geometrical interpretation of anomalies** which I think can resolve some of your questions. The basic source of anomalies is that classically and quantum-mechanically we are working with realizations and representations of the symmetry group, i.e., given a group of symmetries through a standard realization on some space we need to lift the action to the adequate geometrical objects we work with in classical and quantum theory and sometimes, this action cannot be lifted. Mathematically, this is called an obstruction to the action lifting, which is the origin of anomalies. The obstructions often lead to the possibility to the realization not of the group of symmetries itself but some extension of it by another group acting naturally on the geometrical objects defining the theory.

<cite>https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/33195/classical-and-quantum-anomalies</cite>
</blockquote>

The non-Abelian chiral anomaly is very well understood algebraically and topoplogically, please see the following review by R. A. Bertlmann. In the example following equation (38) in the article, **all the quantities associated with the non-Abelian chiral anomaly are algebraically computed (without solving Feynman diagrams) through what is called the Stora-Zumino descent equations.**
**These equations give on the first level the Chern-Simons term, on the second level, the anomaly (divergence of the current), on the third level, the extension in the gauge group commutation relations and on the fourth level, the associator causing the violation of the Jacobi-identity,** thus resulting a non associative algebra (please see the following related physics stack exchange question).

I mentioned, the descent equations, because there is a modern concept of [[advanced_tools:gerbes]] trying to find geometrical realization of these equations (please see also the following Mickelsson's review). This direction of research has the potential of providing deeper understanding what are the quantum structures that we must associate to these algebras (interpreted as classical algebras of Poisson brackets) because the usual Hilbert spaces and unitary representations do not seem to work. The Mickelsson-Faddeev algebra was extensively analyzed within the theory of gerbes, please see for example this work by Hekmati, Murray, Stevenson and Vozzo (and also the above Micklsson's reference).
<cite>https://physics.stackexchange.com/a/76653/37286</cite>
</blockquote>

The chiral anomaly can be corrected by adding a Wess-Zumino term to the Lagrangian, but this term is not perturbatively renormalizable, thus does not solve the nonrenormalizability problem.
<cite>https://physics.stackexchange.com/a/34022/37286</cite>
</blockquote>

**Important Papers:**

* [[https://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.39.693|Uniqueness of quark and lepton representations in the standard model from the anomalies viewpoint]] by C. Q. Geng and R. E. Marshak
  * [[https://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.41.715|Comment on anomaly cancellation in the standard model]] by J. A. Minahan, P. Ramond, and R. C. Warner 
  * [[http://www.iaea.org/inis/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/21/068/21068700.pdf|CHARGED NEUTRINOS?]] by R. Foot et. al.
  *[[http://xxx.lanl.gov/pdf/hep-th/0006230v1| Particle creation via relaxing hypermagnetic knots]] by C. Adam et. al.

** Recommended Resources:**

* The best explanation for the idea that anomalies are related to extensions of the corresponding Lie algebra, can be found in www.atlantis-press.com/php/download_paper.php?id=754. In addition, the paper nicely summarizes the various approaches that have been used so far to deal with anomalies.
  * An introduction to the geometric picture of anomalies can be found in [[http://inspirehep.net/record/192970|Chiral Anomalies And Differential Geometry]]: Lectures Given At Les Houches, August 1983 by Bruno Zumino
  * See also https://www.mathi.uni-heidelberg.de/~walcher/teaching/sose16/geo_phys/Anomalies.pdf
  * see also [[https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/00018739000101531|Geometry and topology of chiral anomalies in gauge theories]] By R. RENNIE
<tabbox Why is it interesting?>

<blockquote>
Anomalies are often a useful first line of attack in trying to understand new systems. This is because the presence of anomalies, or the way they are canceled, can often be studied without knowing the detailed dynamics of the theory. They are in a way topological properties of the theory and thus can be studied by approximate methods.

<cite>https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-th/0509097.pdf</cite>
</blockquote>

<blockquote>
Implications of quantum anomalies are numerous. First and foremost,
their knowledge is needed in order to avoid theories which look fully “legitimate”
at the classical level, but become terminally sick upon quantization.
For instance, suppose one would like to build an extension of the Standard
Model, with additional fermions beyond the standard three generations. If
the fermion content is chosen inappropriately, such an extension may well be
internally inconsistent.
Second, the chiral quantum anomalies play an important role in the soft
pion theory in QCD, and in the ’t Hooft matching condition, which, in turn,
presents the foundation for the Seiberg duality in supersymmetric QCD.
The scale quantum anomalies which are typical of asymptotically free field
theories (such as QCD) can be used for establishing a number of low-energy
theorems.

<cite>https://physique.cuso.ch/fileadmin/physique/document/2015_shifman_lecture_1.pdf</cite>
</blockquote>

<blockquote>
In four-dimensional quantum field theories, the problem of the anomaly or Schwinger term is much trickier. Current algebra in four dimensions has led to a significant amount of understanding of the physical aspects of the problem. **One of the earliest physical consequences of the anomaly concerned the rate at which neutral pions decay into two photons. If one ignores the anomaly problem, current algebra predicts that this decay will be relatively slow, whereas experimentally it happens very quickly. Once one takes into account the anomaly, the current algebra calculation agrees well with experiment.** This calculation depends on the number of colours in QCD, and its success was one of the earliest pieces of evidence that quarks had to come in three colours. Another successful physical prediction related to the anomaly was mentioned earlier. This is the fact that, **ignoring the anomaly, there should be nine low-mass pions, the Nambu-Goldstone bosons of the spontaneously broken symmetry in current algebra. In reality, there are nine pions, but only eight of them are relatively low mass. The higher mass of the ninth one can be explained once one takes into account the effect of the anomaly.**

<cite>Not Even Wrong by P. Woit</cite>
</blockquote>

<blockquote>
for me chiral and scale symmetry breaking are completely natural effects, but their description in our present language – quantum field theory – is awkward and leads us to extreme formulations, which make use of infinities. One hopes that there is a more felicitous description, in an as yet undiscovered language. **It is striking that anomalies afflict precisely those symmetries that depend on absence of mass: chiral symmetry, scale symmetry. Perhaps when we have a natural language for anomalous symmetry breaking we shall also be able to speak in a comprehensible way about mass, which today remains a mystery.**

<cite>[[https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-th/9602122.pdf|THE UNREASONABLE EFFECTIVENESS OF QUANTUM FIELD THEORY]] by R. Jackiw</cite>
</blockquote>

<blockquote>
On the other hand, anomalies in physics are not always unwanted features to be eradicated. E.g. the trace anomalies associated to dilatation invariance lead to the Callan– Symanzik equations [7].

<cite>http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.2991/jnmp.2001.8.4.6</cite>
</blockquote>

<blockquote>
In dimensions other than the critical dimension, the action $S$ of the Bosonic string theory has a conformal anomaly.

<cite>page 267 in Topology and Quantum Field Theory by Charles Nash</cite>
</blockquote>

<blockquote>
It began with the pioneering work of Alvarez-Gaume and Witten [Alvarez-Gaume, Witten 1983] on gravitational anomalies, and the enthusiasm culminated in the discovery of Green and Schwarz [Green, Schwarz 1984]that gauge and gravitational anomalies may cancel each other, however, in a supersymmetric theory in 10 dimensions.

<cite>Anomalies in Quantum Field Theory by Reinhold A. Bertlmann</cite>
</blockquote>

<blockquote>
One of the earliest physical consequences of the anomaly concerned the rate at which neutral pions decay into two photons. If one ignores the anomaly problem, current algebra predicts that this decay will be relatively slow, whereas experimentally it happens very quickly. Once one takes into account the anomaly, the current algebra calculation agrees well with experiment. This calculation depends on the number of colours in QCD, and its
success was one of the earliest pieces of evidence that quarks had
to come in three colours. Another successful physical prediction
related to the anomaly was mentioned earlier. This is the fact that,
ignoring the anomaly, there should be nine low-mass pions, the
Nambu-Goldstone bosons of the spontaneously broken symmetry in
current algebra. In reality, there are nine pions, but only eight of
them are relatively low mass. The higher mass of the ninth one can
be explained once one takes into account the effect of the anomaly.

<cite>Not Even Wrong by P. Woit</cite>
</blockquote>

<blockquote>
On the other hand, anomalies in physics are not always unwanted features to be eradicated. E.g. the trace anomalies associated to dilatation invariance lead to the Callan– Symanzik equations [7].

<cite>www.atlantis-press.com/php/download_paper.php?id=754</cite>
</blockquote>

<tabbox FAQ> 
->Are theories with gauge anomalies necessarily inconsistent?#

No! See [[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/000349169190046B?via%3Dihub|Gauge anomalies in an effective field theory]] by JohnPreskill
<--

-->Why do we study anomalies with the triangle diagram?#
see https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/303914/why-do-we-study-anomalies-with-the-triangle-diagram
<--

--> Where does the name anomaly come from?#

<blockquote>
The nomenclature is misleading. At its discovery, the phenomenon was unexpected
and dubbed 'anomalous'. By now the surprise has worn off, and the better name
today is 'quantum mechanical' symmetry breaking

<cite>[[https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9602122|The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Quantum Field Theory]] by R. Jackiw</cite>
</blockquote>

<blockquote>
You have to appreciate the frame of mind that field theorists operated in to understand their shock when they discovered in the late 1960s that quantum fluctuations can indeed break classical symmetries. Indeed, they were so shocked as to give this phenomenon the rather misleading name "anomaly", as if it were some kind of sickness of field theory. With the benefits of hindsight, we now understand the anomaly as being no less conceptually innocuous as the elementary fact that when we change integration variables in an integral we better not forget the Jacobian.

<cite>QFT in a Nutshell by A. Zee</cite>
</blockquote>

<blockquote>
[T]he anomaly refers to a subtlety in quantization: a symmetry of the classical theory does not work in the expected way in the quantum theory. You already see this in the phenomenon of the one-half energy of the ground state in the harmonic oscillator. You can get rid of this by redefining the Hamiltonian, but that changes how the symmetries of the classical system are implemented in the quantum system. For a finite number of degrees of freedom, you can work with either Hamiltonian, but in QFT, with an infinite number of degrees of freedom, you don’t have a finite shift and this causes the anomaly. Put differently, **the anomaly is due to the fact that normal-ordering is needed in QFT, and this sometimes changes how classical symmetries appear after quantization.**

<cite>https://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=7847</cite>
</blockquote>

<blockquote>
It is important to avoid
here the misconception that anomalies appear due to a bad choice of the way a theory is regularized
in the process of quantization. When we talk about anomalies we mean a classical symmetry that //cannot// be realized in the quantum theory, no matter how smart we are in choosing the regularization
procedure.

<cite>https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-th/0510040.pdf</cite>
</blockquote>
 
<--

--> How can we get rid of anomalies?#

There are several ways:

<blockquote>
A remark on the non-uniqueness of the mechanism of anomaly cancellation: We can cancel anomalies by adding a new family of fermions, various Wess-zumino terms (corresponding to different anomaly free subgroups), and may be masses to the gauge fields (as in the Schwinger model). This non-uniqueness, reflects the fact that when anomaly is present, the quantization is not unique, (in other words the theory is not completely defined). This phenomenon is known in many cases in quantum mechanics (inequivalent quantizations of a particle on a circle), and quantum field theory (theta vacua).

Finally, my point of view is that the anomaly cancellation does not dismiss the need of finding "representations" to the anomalous current algebras in each sector. This principle works in 1+1 dimensions. It should work in any dimension because according to Wigner quantum theory deals with representations of algebras. This is why I think that Mickelsson's project is important.

<cite>https://physics.stackexchange.com/a/34022/37286</cite>
</blockquote>

<--

--> What about higher order corrections to the Chiral Anomaly?#

<blockquote>
In all our discussion of anomalies we only considered the computation of one-
loop diagrams. It might happen that higher loop orders impose additional conditions. Fortunately this is not so: the Adler–Bardeen theorem [[https://journals.aps.org/pr/abstract/10.1103/PhysRev.182.1517|[12]]] guarantees that the
axial anomaly only receives contributions from one loop diagrams. Therefore, once
anomalies are canceled (if possible) at one loop we know that there will be no new
conditions coming from higher-loop diagrams in perturbation theory.
The Adler–Bardeen theorem, however, only applies in perturbation theory. It is
nonetheless possible that nonperturbative effects can result in the quantum violation
of a gauge symmetry. This is precisely the case pointed out by Witten [[https://inspirehep.net/record/181968/|[13]]] with
respect to the SU(2) gauge symmetry of the standard model. In this case the problem
lies in the nontrivial topology of the gauge group SU(2). The invariance of the theory
with respect to non-trivial gauge transformations requires the number of fermion
doublets to be even. It is again remarkable that the family structure of the standard
model makes this anomaly cancel

<cite>page 192 in "An Invitation to Quantum Field Theory" by Luis Álvarez-Gaumé et. al.</cite>
</blockquote>
 
<--

--> What do anomalies have to do with index theorems?#

<blockquote>
From the point of view of a mathematician, one aspect of the anomaly is that it is related both to the Atiyah-Singer index theorem and to a generalisation known as the index theorem for families. Whereas the original index theorem describes the number of solutions to a single equation and does this in terms of the number of solutions of a [[equations:dirac_equation]], the families index theorem deals with a whole class or family of equations at once. A family of Dirac equations arises in physics because one has a different Dirac equation for every different Yang-Mills field, so the possible Yang-Mills fields parametrise a family of Dirac equations. This situation turns out to be one ideally suited to the use of general versions of the index theorem already known to mathematicians, and in turn has suggested new versions and relations to other parts of mathematics that mathematicians had not thought of before. As usual, Witten was the central figure in these interactions between mathematicians and physicists, producing a fascinating series of papers about different physical and mathematical aspects of the anomaly problem.

<cite>Not even Wrong by P. Woit</cite>
</blockquote>
 
<--
--> Are anomalies really pure quantum effects?#

No! See www.atlantis-press.com/php/download_paper.php?id=754
 
<--

--> Are anomalies UV or IR effects?#

IR effects. See section 1.6 in https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-th/0509097.pdf and also

<blockquote>
It is true that chiral anomalies were discovered in quantum field theories when no ultraviolet regulators respecting the chiral symmetry could be found. But anomaly is actually an infrared property of the theory. The signs for that is the Adler-Bardeen theorem that no higher loop (than one) correction to the axial anomaly is present and more importantly only massless particles contribute to the anomaly. In the operator approach that I tried to adopt in this answer the anomaly is a consequence of a deformation that should be performed on the symmetry generators in order to be well defined on the physical Hilbert space and not a direct consequence of regularization.

<cite>https://physics.stackexchange.com/a/33217/37286</cite>
</blockquote>
 
<--

-->Can anomalies be observed?#

Yes! In addition, to indirect effects anomalies can be directly observed in solid state systems. See, for example https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1605/1605.09214.pdf
<--

-->Why do some anomalies (only) lead to inconsistent quantum field theories#
see https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/33972/why-do-some-anomalies-only-lead-to-inconsistent-quantum-field-theories/34022#34022
<--
<tabbox History> 
<blockquote>
Early work on current algebra during the 1960s had turned up a
rather confusing problem which was dubbed an 'anomaly'. The
source of the difficulty was something that had been studied by
Schwinger back in 1951, and so became known as the problem of
the Schwinger term appearing in certain calculations. The Schwinger
term was causing the Hilbert space of the current algebra to not quite
be a representation of the symmetry group of the model. The stan-
dard ways of constructing quantum mechanical systems ensured that
if there was a symmetry group of the system, the Hilbert space should
be a representation of it. In the current algebra theory, this almost
worked as expected, but the Schwinger term, or equivalently, the
anomaly, indicated that there was a problem.
The underlying source of the problem had to do with the neces-
sity of using renormalisation techniques to define properly the current
algebra quantum field theory. As in QED and most quantum field
theories, these renormalisation techniques were necessary to remove
some infinities that occur if one calculates things in the most straight-
forward fashion. Renormalisation introduced some extra U(l) phase
transformations into the problem, ruining the standard argument that shows that the Hilbert space of the quantum theory should be a
representation of the symmetry group. Some way needed to be found
to deal with these extra U(l) phase transformations.
In two-dimensional theories, it is now well understood how to treat
this problem. In this case, the anomalous U(l) phase transformations
can be dealt with by just adding an extra factor of U(l) to the orig-
inal infinite-dimensional symmetry group of the theory. The Hilbert
space of the two-dimensional theory is a representation, but it is one
of a slightly bigger symmetry group than one might naively have
thought. This extra U(l) piece of the symmetry group also appears
in some of the infinite dimensional Kac-Moody groups. So in two
dimensions the physics leading to the anomaly and the mathemat-
ics of Kac-Moody groups fit together in a consistent way.
In four-dimensional quantum field theories, the problem of the
anomaly or Schwinger term is much trickier. Current algebra in four
dimensions has led to a significant amount of understanding of the
physical aspects of the problem. One of the earliest physical conse-
quences of the anomaly concerned the rate at which neutral pions
decay into two photons. If one ignores the anomaly problem, current
algebra predicts that this decay will be relatively slow, whereas exper-
imentally it happens very quickly. Once one takes into account the
anomaly, the current algebra calculation agrees well with experiment.
This calculation depends on the number of colours in QCD, and its
success was one of the earliest pieces of evidence that quarks had
to come in three colours. Another successful physical prediction
related to the anomaly was mentioned earlier. This is the fact that,
ignoring the anomaly, there should be nine low-mass pions, the
Nambu-Goldstone bosons of the spontaneously broken symmetry in
current algebra. In reality, there are nine pions, but only eight of
them are relatively low mass. The higher mass of the ninth one can
be explained once one takes into account the effect of the anomaly.

<cite>page 129ff in Not Even Wrong by P. Woit</cite>
</blockquote>
</tabbox>

Please solve the following equation to prove you're human. 41 +1 = Please keep this field empty:

Edit summary

Note: By editing this page you agree to license your content under the following license: CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International

User Tools

Site Tools

Page Tools