This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Last revision Both sides next revision | ||
advanced_notions:elementary_particles [2017/09/23 13:29] jakobadmin [Student] |
advanced_notions:elementary_particles [2018/04/09 10:46] tesmitekle [FAQ] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====== Elementary Particles ====== | ====== Elementary Particles ====== | ||
- | <tabbox Why is it interesting?> | ||
- | |||
- | <tabbox Layman?> | ||
- | [[http://www.ejsme.net/articles/52/523.pdf|Why not start with quarks? Teachers investigate a learning unit on | + | <tabbox Intuitive> |
- | the subatomic structure of matter with 12-year-olds]] by Gerfried J. Wiener, Sascha M. Schmeling and Martin Hopf | + | |
+ | * A nice overview is given here: https://profmattstrassler.com/articles-and-posts/particle-physics-basics/the-known-apparently-elementary-particles/ | ||
+ | * [[http://www.ejsme.net/articles/52/523.pdf|Why not start with quarks? Teachers investigate a learning unit on the subatomic structure of matter with 12-year-olds]] by Gerfried J. Wiener, Sascha M. Schmeling and Martin Hopf | ||
+ | * [[https://gravityandlevity.wordpress.com/2015/04/11/how-big-is-an-electron/|How big is an electron?]] by Brian Skinner | ||
| | ||
- | <tabbox Student> | + | <tabbox Concrete> |
+ | {{ :advanced_notions:elemparticles.png?nolink |}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
In the 1970’s, high energy physicists pursued Lie algebra theory as a valuable tool to characterize all the gauge interactions. These are now understood to be SU(3) for the strong force (which describes the interacations between quarks, which are the constituents of hadrons such as the proton), and SU(2) × U(1) for both the weak and electromagnetic interactions of quarks and leptons (such as the electron). This is an important feature of the standard model of particle physics [YM,We,Sa,Gl]. Grand unification was an effort to combine these symmetries as subgroups of a unifying group such as SU(5). Superstring unification provides an alternative mechanism to combine symmetries. | In the 1970’s, high energy physicists pursued Lie algebra theory as a valuable tool to characterize all the gauge interactions. These are now understood to be SU(3) for the strong force (which describes the interacations between quarks, which are the constituents of hadrons such as the proton), and SU(2) × U(1) for both the weak and electromagnetic interactions of quarks and leptons (such as the electron). This is an important feature of the standard model of particle physics [YM,We,Sa,Gl]. Grand unification was an effort to combine these symmetries as subgroups of a unifying group such as SU(5). Superstring unification provides an alternative mechanism to combine symmetries. | ||
Line 24: | Line 27: | ||
<cite>http://thep.housing.rug.nl/sites/default/files/theses/Master%20thesis_Marco%20Boers.pdf</cite> | <cite>http://thep.housing.rug.nl/sites/default/files/theses/Master%20thesis_Marco%20Boers.pdf</cite> | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
- | <tabbox Researcher> | + | |
+ | <tabbox Abstract> | ||
+ | * http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/qg-spring2003/elementary/ | ||
+ | * See http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/33350/particle-as-a-representation-of-the-lorentz-group | ||
+ | * [[http://www.pnas.org/content/99/1/33.full.pdf|A closer look at the elementary fermions]] by Maurice Goldhaber | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
Line 39: | Line 46: | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
- | + | <tabbox Why is it interesting?> | |
- | <tabbox Examples> | + | |
- | --> Example1# | + | Elementary particles are the fundamental building blocks and also responsible for the fundamental interactions like electromagnetism. |
+ | <tabbox FAQ> | ||
- | + | --> How large is an elementary particle?# | |
- | <-- | + | |
- | --> Example2:# | + | See https://axelmaas.blogspot.de/2018/02/how-large-is-elementary-particle.html?m=1 |
+ | <-- | ||
- | + | -->Why do physicists believe that particles are pointlike?# | |
+ | see https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/41676/why-do-physicists-believe-that-particles-are-pointlike | ||
<-- | <-- | ||
| |