This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision | Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
advanced_notions:duality [2018/04/30 13:27] jakobadmin [Why is it interesting?] |
advanced_notions:duality [2018/05/05 12:10] jakobadmin [Concrete] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
Jordan-Wigner, bosonization, Wegner, particle-vortex, perhaps others). This word is dangerous (it is one of the forbidden words on my blackboard) because it is about ambiguities | Jordan-Wigner, bosonization, Wegner, particle-vortex, perhaps others). This word is dangerous (it is one of the forbidden words on my blackboard) because it is about ambiguities | ||
in our (physics) language. <cite>[[https://mcgreevy.physics.ucsd.edu/s14/239a-lectures.pdf|Where do quantum field theories come from?]] by McGreevy</cite></blockquote> | in our (physics) language. <cite>[[https://mcgreevy.physics.ucsd.edu/s14/239a-lectures.pdf|Where do quantum field theories come from?]] by McGreevy</cite></blockquote> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <blockquote> | ||
+ | There are many theories, which have more than one Lagrangian. So that's the opposite. Either we have no Lagrangian at all or we have more than one Lagrangian. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <cite>Duality and emergent gauge symmetry - Nathan Seiberg</cite> | ||
+ | </blockquote> | ||
<tabbox Abstract> | <tabbox Abstract> | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> |