Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Last revision Both sides next revision | ||
advanced_notions:duality [2018/04/02 10:26] jakobadmin [Intuitive] |
advanced_notions:duality [2018/05/05 12:50] jakobadmin ↷ Page moved from advanced_notions:quantum_field_theory:duality to advanced_notions:duality |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
by Giarczynski]]</cite> | by Giarczynski]]</cite> | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <blockquote>There should be two "dual equivalent" field formulations of the same theory in which electric (Noether) and magnetic (topological) quantum numbers exchange roles.<cite>[[http://www.indiana.edu/~jpac/QCDRef/1970s/MAGNETIC%20MONOPOLES%20AS%20GAUGE%20PARTICLES%20-%20Montonen%20-%201977.pdf|Magnetic monopoles as gauge particles?]] by C. Montonen and D. Olive</cite></blockquote> | ||
<-- | <-- | ||
Line 81: | Line 83: | ||
Jordan-Wigner, bosonization, Wegner, particle-vortex, perhaps others). This word is dangerous (it is one of the forbidden words on my blackboard) because it is about ambiguities | Jordan-Wigner, bosonization, Wegner, particle-vortex, perhaps others). This word is dangerous (it is one of the forbidden words on my blackboard) because it is about ambiguities | ||
in our (physics) language. <cite>[[https://mcgreevy.physics.ucsd.edu/s14/239a-lectures.pdf|Where do quantum field theories come from?]] by McGreevy</cite></blockquote> | in our (physics) language. <cite>[[https://mcgreevy.physics.ucsd.edu/s14/239a-lectures.pdf|Where do quantum field theories come from?]] by McGreevy</cite></blockquote> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <blockquote> | ||
+ | There are many theories, which have more than one Lagrangian. So that's the opposite. Either we have no Lagrangian at all or we have more than one Lagrangian. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <cite>Duality and emergent gauge symmetry - Nathan Seiberg</cite> | ||
+ | </blockquote> | ||
<tabbox Abstract> | <tabbox Abstract> | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
Line 92: | Line 100: | ||
<tabbox Why is it interesting?> | <tabbox Why is it interesting?> | ||
- | Oftentimes in physics, we can only calculate things in terms of a [[advanced_notions:quantum_field_theory:perturbation_theory|perturbation series]]. Especially, in quantum field theory, this is almost always the case. The perturbation series in [[theories:quantum_field_theory|quantum field theory]] is usually a series in the small coupling constant of the interaction in question. However, when this interaction constant becomes too large, such a perturbative approach no longer yields a good approximation. This is especially problematic for quantum chromodynamics at low energies, where the strong coupling constant becomes too large. | + | Oftentimes in physics, we can only calculate things in terms of a [[advanced_notions:quantum_field_theory:perturbation_theory|perturbation series]]. Especially, in quantum field theory, this is almost always the case. The perturbation series in [[theories:quantum_field_theory:canonical|quantum field theory]] is usually a series in the small coupling constant of the interaction in question. However, when this interaction constant becomes too large, such a perturbative approach no longer yields a good approximation. This is especially problematic for quantum chromodynamics at low energies, where the strong coupling constant becomes too large. |
A duality can be an enormously powerful tool in such a situation. A dual theory describes the same physics, but in a different way. Especially the coupling constant of a dual theory is inversely proportional to the original coupling constant. Hence, whenever the coupling constant becomes too large the calculation can be done in the dual theory instead, where we can work with a small coupling constant. | A duality can be an enormously powerful tool in such a situation. A dual theory describes the same physics, but in a different way. Especially the coupling constant of a dual theory is inversely proportional to the original coupling constant. Hence, whenever the coupling constant becomes too large the calculation can be done in the dual theory instead, where we can work with a small coupling constant. | ||
Line 99: | Line 107: | ||
<blockquote>The idea of duality has been at the centre of many important developments in the theoretical physics of the last 50 years. In fundamental physics, the notion of duality has been applied to very different kinds of theories. First, there is the dual resonance model of the late sixties, from which early string theory originated. Successively, one of the most important developments of this idea was the generalization, proposed by Claus Montonen and David Olive in 1977, of electromagnetic duality in the framework of quantum field theory. This was later extended to the context of string theory, where dualities have also spawned recent developments in fundamental physics, offering a window into non-perturbative physics, and motivating both the M theory conjecture and gauge-gravity duality<cite>https://arxiv.org/pdf/1803.09443.pdf</cite></blockquote> | <blockquote>The idea of duality has been at the centre of many important developments in the theoretical physics of the last 50 years. In fundamental physics, the notion of duality has been applied to very different kinds of theories. First, there is the dual resonance model of the late sixties, from which early string theory originated. Successively, one of the most important developments of this idea was the generalization, proposed by Claus Montonen and David Olive in 1977, of electromagnetic duality in the framework of quantum field theory. This was later extended to the context of string theory, where dualities have also spawned recent developments in fundamental physics, offering a window into non-perturbative physics, and motivating both the M theory conjecture and gauge-gravity duality<cite>https://arxiv.org/pdf/1803.09443.pdf</cite></blockquote> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <blockquote>Duality symmetries: mapping two theories or two different descriptions of a theory one-to-one to | ||
+ | the other. The prime example is self-duality for the free Maxwell theory: you | ||
+ | can mutually exchange the electric and the magnetic field, and this replacement | ||
+ | leaves Maxwell’s equations invariant. Another example is quantum physics either | ||
+ | described by Schrödinger’s wave equation or with Heisenberg’s matrix mechanics. | ||
+ | Today, dualities are experiencing a boom, triggered by so called string theory. | ||
+ | The five families of string models exhibit astoundingly many dualities, if one | ||
+ | introduces branes; for a non-expert this is nicely described in [433]. Another very | ||
+ | influential development was the discovery of a duality between anti-de Sitter grav- | ||
+ | ity and a conformal field theory, sometimes named after its inventor as Maldacena | ||
+ | conjecture. <cite>Symmetries in Fundamental Physics by Sundermeyer</cite></blockquote> | ||
</tabbox> | </tabbox> | ||